Results 61 to 70 of about 54,657 (306)

Giving Up

open access: yesJournal of Applied Philosophy, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT Philosophical accounts of long‐term goals focus predominantly on the rationality of perseverance, examining when agents should persist despite evidence of failure. Arguably, these accounts consider that giving up is devoid of value. Conversely, this article argues that giving up has a different epistemic function: generating information about ...
Mario I. Juarez‐Garcia
wiley   +1 more source

The Comparative Effectiveness of a Group Therapy for Overcontrol (Group Radical Openness) When Delivered In‐Person vs. Remotely: Findings from a Retrospective Naturalistic Service Evaluation

open access: yesJournal of Clinical Psychology, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT Objectives Group Radical Openness (GRO) is a group therapy for the treatment of costly and harmful overcontrol. The COVID‐19 pandemic necessitated the remote delivery of GRO, notwithstanding its highly interpersonal therapeutic focus. Based on positive service user feedback, the option to attend remotely was maintained after the pandemic. This
Conal Twomey, Siobhan Duffy, Rachel Egan
wiley   +1 more source

The Curious Silence of the Dog and Paul of Tarsus; Revisiting The Argument from Silence

open access: yesInformal Logic, 2012
In this essay I propose an interpretative and explanatory structure for the so-called argumentum ex silento, or argument from silence (henceforth referred to as the AFS). To this end, I explore two examples, namely, Sherlock Holmes’s oft-quoted notice of
Michael Gary Duncan
doaj  

Pragmatic Considerations in the Interpretation of Denying the Antecedent

open access: yesInformal Logic, 2009
In this paper I am concerned with the analysis of fragments of a discourse or text that express arguments suspected of being denials of the antecedent. I first argue that one needs to distinguish between two senses of ‘the argument expressed’.
Andrei Moldovan
doaj   +1 more source

The Flatland Fallacy: Moving Beyond Low–Dimensional Thinking

open access: yesTopics in Cognitive Science, 2018
Psychology is a complicated science. It has no general axioms or mathematical proofs, is rarely directly observable, and is the only discipline in which the subject matter (i.e., human psychological phenomena) is also the tool of investigation.
E. Jolly, Luke J. Chang
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Implications of attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder diagnostic timing on mental health service utilisation in young adult females: A population‐based record linkage cohort study

open access: yesJCPP Advances, EarlyView.
Abstract Background Sex differences in the frequency and timing of attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) diagnosis exist. While there are multiple known individual and wider consequences for young females with delayed or undiagnosed ADHD, little is known about mental health service utilisation (HSU) impacts.
Estelle Alderson   +4 more
wiley   +1 more source

Psychological Research and the Epistemological Approach to Argumentation

open access: yesInformal Logic, 2008
Much psychological research on argumentation focuses on persuasion and pragmatics. However, one strand investigates how average people understand the nature of knowledge and knowing, and how these epistemological orientations underlie skilled ...
Michael P. Weinstock
doaj   +1 more source

Different Levels, Same Relations? A Meta‐Analysis on the Homology of the Nomological Network of (Daily) Work Engagement

open access: yesJournal of Organizational Behavior, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT Work engagement has garnered significant attention from researchers and practitioners in recent decades, and several meta‐analyses have examined its stable, between‐person correlates. However, work engagement also has a dynamic component, meaning that it varies daily, across situations, and within individuals.
Jan Luca Pletzer   +4 more
wiley   +1 more source

Denying Antecedents and Affirming Consequents: The State of the Art

open access: yesInformal Logic, 2015
Recent work on conditional reasoning argues that denying the antecedent [DA] and affirming the consequent [AC] are defeasible but cogent patterns of argument, either because they are effective, rational, albeit heuristic applications of Bayesian ...
David Godden, Frank Zenker
doaj   +3 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy