Results 251 to 260 of about 4,165,305 (291)

Opportunities of Administrative Coercion Measures for the Protection of the National Security of the Russian Federation

Administrative law and procedure, 2022
The article shows the role of administrative coercion measures that are used to prevent such threats to national security as the consequences of emergencies at hazardous production facilities and non-compliance with the requirements for their anti-terrorist protection.
openaire   +1 more source

Assessing the Spanish State’s Response to Catalan Independence: The Application of Federal Coercion

2020
This chapter explores recent developments in Spain, a multinational unitary democracy with quasi-federal features currently experiencing a constitutional and democratic crisis. The chapter shows that the Spanish central government’s response to the Catalan declaration of independence on October 1, 2017 has entailed the application of federal coercion ...
exaly   +2 more sources

Administrative Coercion Measures Applied in Respect of Foreign Citizens in the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus

Administrative law and procedure, 2021
The article provides a comparative legal analysis of administrative and coercive measures applied exclusively to foreign citizens in the Russian Federation and in the Republic of Belarus. The article examines in detail the administrative procedure for the application of such removal measures as administrative expulsion, deportation, ban on entry ...
openaire   +1 more source

State Finding on Coercion Does Not Bar Federal De Novo Determination in Habeas Proceeding

Columbia Law Review, 1956
exaly   +2 more sources

Article 7 - The Principles of Federal Coercion

2013
Art. 7 TEU provides a penalty procedure directed toward maintaining the foundational values of the Union (values also shared in common among the Member States), giving the EU institutions the means to ensure that any Member State respects those common values. It is a means to guarantee the principles and values mentioned in Art. 2 TEU, which represents
MANGIAMELI, Stelio, Saputelli G.
openaire   +3 more sources

Commentary Assails Shift Toward Coercion in Federal MH Policy

Mental Health Weekly
The Trump administration's push favoring more coercive approaches governing mental health policy ignores scientific evidence and unfairly targets serious mental illness as the primary cause of many social ills, authors affiliated with Harvard University argue in a newly published commentary.
exaly   +2 more sources

Students’ Preference for Admission Into Federal Colleges of Education (Technical) in Nigeria: Voluntary Choice or Systemic Coercion?

Federal University Gusau Faculty of Education Journal
This study investigates the degree to which student admission into Nigeria’s Federal Colleges of Education (Technical) is informed by personal preference or imposed by systemic, familial, and policy constraints. Using a mixed-methods design, data were gathered from 470 students across ten federal technical colleges situated in Nigeria’s six ...
exaly   +2 more sources

Commandeering, Coercion, and the Deep Structure of American Federalism

2014
The anti-commandeering and anti-coercion principles announced in New York v. United States and NFIB v. Sebelius have great potential importance, but the most prominent justification for them is seriously flawed. This Essay elaborates a more persuasive and largely neglected alternative, grounded in the deep structure of American federalism.
openaire   +1 more source

Liberty, Competition, and the Rise of Coercion in American Federalism

1995
Changing conceptions of liberty and equality in the United States have given rise in recent decades to a new, coercive phase of American federalism in which the federal government engages in unprecedented regulation of state and local governments and displacement of their sovereign powers.
openaire   +1 more source

Federal Coercion and National Constitutional Identity in the United States 1776-1861

American Journal of Legal History, 2016
This article examines the development of the federal coercion power of the U.S. government during the period from the Declaration of Independence to the Civil War. Although unhappy with the states’ defiance of federal requisitions, the Founders agreed at the Constitutional Convention that the national government should not have the power to coerce ...
openaire   +1 more source