Results 221 to 230 of about 282,737 (397)
Foot-and-Mouth Disease control costs compared: An Irish case study. [PDF]
The primary objective of this paper is to evaluate alternative control strategies for a number of simulated outbreaks of Foot-and-Mouth Disease (FMD) in four agriculturally diverse Irish regions, examining for the first time, the potential role of ...
Dillon, Emma J.+2 more
core +1 more source
Among 668 with cardiogenic shock included in the multicentre prospective Altshock‐2 registry, 299 patients (44.8%) received pre‐admission beta‐blocker therapy. Previous beta‐blocker therapy influenced the early hemodynamic response to vasoactive drugs, but it was not associated with in‐hospital mortality.
Matteo Pagnesi+21 more
wiley +1 more source
Foot-and-mouth disease reproduction number: a scoping review. [PDF]
Gunasekera U+3 more
europepmc +1 more source
For most patients with chronic, progressive illnesses, maintaining good quality of life (QoL), with preserved functional capacity, is just as crucial as prolonging survival. Patients with heart failure (HF) experience much worse QoL and effort intolerance than both the general population and people with other chronic conditions, since they present a ...
Maurizio Volterrani+21 more
wiley +1 more source
Spatio-temporal dynamics of hand, foot and mouth disease in Malaysia, 2009-2019. [PDF]
Cox VM+14 more
europepmc +1 more source
Cross-Cultural Awareness: Good Manners, Taboos, and Foot-in-Mouth Disease [PDF]
Lindenau, Suzanne E.
core +2 more sources
New anticancer therapies with potential cardiovascular side effects are continuously being introduced into clinical practice, with new and often unexpected toxicities becoming apparent only after clinical introduction. These unknown toxicities should be identified and understood beforehand to better prepare patients and physicians, enabling the ...
Alessandra Ghigo+22 more
wiley +1 more source
CD44 mediates the internalization of foot-and-mouth disease virus through macropinocytosis. [PDF]
Wang X+5 more
europepmc +1 more source
Abstract Exposure levels without appreciable human health risk may be determined by dividing a point of departure on a dose–response curve (e.g., benchmark dose) by a composite adjustment factor (AF). An “effect severity” AF (ESAF) is employed in some regulatory contexts.
Barbara L. Parsons+17 more
wiley +1 more source