Results 161 to 170 of about 3,971 (263)
From the Turing Test to AI detectors: an epistemological mismatch in scholarly publishing. [PDF]
Doğan AR, Doğan Aİ.
europepmc +1 more source
ABSTRACT Across many education systems globally, policy pressures and accountability frameworks have narrowed opportunities for creative and arts‐based learning, limiting teachers' capacity to develop innovative literacy pedagogies. This paper examines how collaborative, arts‐informed professional learning can support the development of affective and ...
Angela Colvert, Lisa Stephenson
wiley +1 more source
ABSTRACT Background The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping language education, with AI‐assisted language learning (AILL) offering new opportunities for personalised support and interactive engagement. However, it remains underexplored how English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners perceive and engage with AI tools in ...
Yonghua Wang +2 more
wiley +1 more source
Evaluating the Presence of Empathic Communication in ChatGPT-Produced Clinical Notes Using Established Communication Frameworks. [PDF]
Bowden S, Moreno K, Million F, Azinge N.
europepmc +1 more source
Provenance, Not Prohibition: A Framework for AI in Scholarly Publishing
ABSTRACT Generative AI is now embedded in scholarly workflows, yet publishing policy has often jumped to permission or prohibition without first defining what is being governed. The central risk is not tool use itself, but loss of provenance: readers, reviewers, and editors must be able to trace how claims, citations, analyses, and interpretations were
Romaine F. Johnson
wiley +1 more source
Clinical Trials Between Truth and Persuasion: The Geography of Evidence in a Global Medicine. [PDF]
Tona F.
europepmc +1 more source
Clarifying the unseen: Assessment workload and time expectations for students in higher education
Abstract Transparency in assessment workload in higher education remains underexplored in research and policy. Students can only develop deep learning strategies and avoid surface learning when they have clear expectations about distribution of assessment workload and the required time investments. This study combines a scoping review of 50 articles to
Astrid Kramer +2 more
wiley +1 more source
Abstract Green and Giblin's ‘systematic review’ of multiliteracies in the December 2025 issue of this journal concludes: there is ‘no evidence’ of impact. This paper replies with a three‐layer analysis of that claim and the evidentiary regime behind it.
Bill Cope, Mary Kalantzis
wiley +1 more source
Generative AI and exacerbated suicide risk among vulnerable populations. [PDF]
Shannonhouse L +3 more
europepmc +1 more source

