Results 231 to 240 of about 1,134 (298)
Exploring YouTube content creators' perspectives on generative AI in language learning: Insights through opinion mining and sentiment analysis. [PDF]
Bal M, Kara Aydemir AG, Coşkun M.
europepmc +1 more source
Review of: Phonology in generative grammar, by Michael Kenstowicz
Parker, Steve
openalex +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Generative Phonology and French Phonology
Language, 1982Foreword Preface Notations and conventions Pronunciation of the phonetic symbols Part I. Languages and Grammars: 1. The sound-meaning correspondence 2. Formal languages and grammars 3. The general organization of grammars Surface structures 4. Linguistic theory Part II. From Surface Structures to Phonetic Representations: 1. Phonetic representations 2.
Betsy K. Barnes +2 more
openaire +1 more source
Phonological derivation in early generative phonology
2022AbstractThis chapter considers the major questions that arose as phonologists utilized and explored the ordered-rule methodology developed in The Sound Pattern of English. Can any limitations be placed on the disparity between the underlying and surface phonetic representations (abstractness, absolute neutralization)?
Michael J. Kenstowicz +1 more
openaire +1 more source
Phonetica, 1973
Abstract Generative phonology and, to some extent, generative transformational linguistics in general, is criticized for its extreme process model, intuitively unacceptable underlying abstractions, its lack of synchrony and exaggerated praise for one’s own achievements coupled with overstated criticism of other orientations.
openaire +1 more source
Abstract Generative phonology and, to some extent, generative transformational linguistics in general, is criticized for its extreme process model, intuitively unacceptable underlying abstractions, its lack of synchrony and exaggerated praise for one’s own achievements coupled with overstated criticism of other orientations.
openaire +1 more source
Radical (Orléans), 2020
This paper outlines a program for the study of phonology as a branch of cognitive science. Building on the legacy of classical generative phonology and biolinguistics, it provides a theoretical framework that strictly differentiates phonological competence from aspects of articulation, acoustics and perception.
Volenec, Veno, Reiss, Charles
openaire +2 more sources
This paper outlines a program for the study of phonology as a branch of cognitive science. Building on the legacy of classical generative phonology and biolinguistics, it provides a theoretical framework that strictly differentiates phonological competence from aspects of articulation, acoustics and perception.
Volenec, Veno, Reiss, Charles
openaire +2 more sources
Generative Generative Phonology
1984The syntactic component σ of a generative grammar G can be thought of as a 4-tuple (N, T, A, R), in which N is the nonterminal vocabulary, T the terminal vocabulary, A the axioms, and R the syntactic rules. It is often assumed that the elements of T, the words of a grammar, can simply be listed in a word-dictionary.
openaire +1 more source
1981
This study is a discussion of, rather than a contribution to, generative phonology. The central question posed, is: Does linguistic theory provide a basis for choosing between competing grammars — that is, an evaluation procedure for grammars? If so, then what is its form?
openaire +1 more source
This study is a discussion of, rather than a contribution to, generative phonology. The central question posed, is: Does linguistic theory provide a basis for choosing between competing grammars — that is, an evaluation procedure for grammars? If so, then what is its form?
openaire +1 more source

