Results 31 to 40 of about 18,451 (250)

ASSESSMENT OF THE SEVERE GEOMAGNETIC STORM ON MAY 10-11, 2024 EFFECTS ON THE GEOMAGNETIC FIELD AND IONOSPHERE OVER THE INDONESIAN REGION

open access: yesRudarsko-geološko-naftni Zbornik
The severe geomagnetic storm on May 11, 2024, is the largest space weather phenomenon in the 25th solar cycle. This paper presents the impact of that severe geomagnetic storm (Dst = -412 nT) on the geomagnetic field and ionosphere over Indonesia ...
Anwar Santoso   +10 more
doaj   +1 more source

After-effects of geomagnetic storms: statistical analysis and theoretical explanation

open access: yesSolar-Terrestrial Physics, 2018
Our previous studies have shown the presence of daytime positive electron density disturb-ances during several days after the start of the recovery phase.
Ratovsky K.G.   +5 more
doaj   +1 more source

PLASMA AND MAGNETIC FIELD CHARACTERISTICS OF SOLAR CORONAL MASS EJECTIONS IN RELATION TO GEOMAGNETIC STORM INTENSITY AND VARIABILITY [PDF]

open access: yes, 2015
The largest geomagnetic storms of solar cycle 24 so far occurred on 2015 March 17 and June 22 with D[subscript st] minima of -223 and -195 nT, respectively. Both of the geomagnetic storms show a multi-step development.
Hu, Huidong   +7 more
core   +2 more sources

Geomagnetic Storm Related to Disturbance Storm Time Indices

open access: yesEuropean Journal of Environment and Earth Sciences, 2021
The magnitude of the Disturbance Storm Time (Dst) index varied in relation to the extremely small negative integer that indicated a large geomagnetic storm. The large sharpened variants of negative Dst indices could describe the detailed features of a geomagnetic storm.
openaire   +2 more sources

Geoeffectiveness of Coronal Mass Ejections in the SOHO era

open access: yes, 2014
The main objective of the study is to determine the probability distributions of the geomagnetic Dst index as a function of the coronal mass ejection (CME) and solar flare parameters for the purpose of establishing a probabilistic forecast tool for the ...
Devos, Andy   +8 more
core   +1 more source

Assessment of the Performance of Ionospheric Models with NavIC Observations during Geomagnetic Storms

open access: yes, 2020
The paper presents an assessment of the performances of the global empirical models: International Reference Ionosphere (IRI)-2016 and the NeQuick2 model derived ionospheric Total Electron Content (TEC) with respect to the Navigation with Indian ...
balan   +4 more
core   +1 more source

Relativistic microburst storm characteristics: Combined satellite and ground-based observations [PDF]

open access: yes, 2010
We report a comparison of Solar Anomalous Magnetospheric Particle Explorer detected relativistic electron microbursts and short-lived subionospheric VLF perturbations termed FAST events, observed at Sodankyl Geophysical Observatory, Finland, during 2005.
Bortnik, Jacob   +4 more
core   +1 more source

Auroral electrojets during geomagnetic storms [PDF]

open access: yesJournal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 1997
On the basis of digital magnetometers from the International monitor auroral geomagnetic effects (IMAGE) and European incoherent scatter (EISCAT) meridional chains in Scandinavia dynamics of the eastward and westward electrojets during the main phase of magnetic storms are considered.
Y. I. Feldstein   +3 more
openaire   +1 more source

Spremembe v gostoti energije magnetnega polja Zemlje na observatoriju PIA, Slovenija, med geomagnetno nevihto G5 11. maja 2024 (= Changes in the energy density of the Earth's magnetic field at the PIA, Slovenia, observatory during the G5 Geomagnetic Storm on May 11, 2024)

open access: yesGeodetski Vestnik
Geomagnetic storms are the largest disturbance in the Earth's magnetic field. On May 11, 2024, a geomagnetic storm occurred at the peak of the 25th solar cycle, reaching the highest level (G5) on the planetary scale.
Rudi Čop
doaj   +1 more source

A study of geomagnetic storms [PDF]

open access: yesGeophysical Journal International, 1978
The interplanetary energy flux is estimated on the basis of the Poynting flux and its variations with the rate of energy dissipation in terms of: (1) the ring-current particle injection, (2) Joule dissipation in the ionosphere, and (3) auroral particle injection for 15 major geomagnetic storms.
Paul Perreault, S.-I. Akasofu
openaire   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy