Results 251 to 260 of about 376,667 (303)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Integral transform methods in goodness-of-fit testing, II: the Wishart distributions

Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 2019
We initiate the study of goodness-of-fit testing for data consisting of positive definite matrices. Motivated by the appearance of positive definite matrices in numerous applications, including factor analysis, diffusion tensor imaging, volatility models
Elena Hadjicosta, D. Richards
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Goodness-of-Fit Testing

2010
A. Maydeu-Olivares, C. García-Forero
openaire   +2 more sources

Goodness-of-Fit Testing for the Degradation Models in Reliability Analysis

IEEE International Conference on Actual Problems of Electronics Instrument Engineering, 2018
In this paper, the gamma and Wiener degradation models with covariates are considered. It is assumed that the independent increments of the degradation index have gamma distribution for the gamma degradation model and normal distribution in case of the ...
E. Chimitova, E. S. Chetvertakova
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Goodness-of-Fit Tests

2018
Based on the substitution principle, we derive one-sample goodness-of-fit tests of Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Cramer-von Mises type, respectively. In the case of a completely specified null hypothesis, these tests are distribution-free, if the cumulative distribution function under the null is a continuous function. In the case of composite null hypotheses,
  +4 more sources

Goodness-of-Fit Tests

1998
Goodness-of-fit tests are used to validate the use of a particular distribution to describe data arising from sampling or experimentation. Numerous goodness-of-fit tests have been developed. The power divergence family of test statistics includes Pearson’s chi-squared test, the likelihood ratio test, and the Freeman-Tukey chi-squared test.
Linda J. Young, Jerry H. Young
openaire   +1 more source

Goodness-of-Fit Tests

2001
Goodness-of-fit techniques are essential for determining whether hypothetical models fit observed data. When at all reasonable, exact tests are preferred to either nonasymptotic or, especially, asymptotic tests. In addition, the structures of these tests yield entirely different detection capabilities for varying alternatives. A selection of techniques
Paul W. Mielke, Kenneth J. Berry
openaire   +1 more source

Goodness-of-Fit Tests

2011
Goodness-of-fit tests are batteries of tests that test that the distribution of a sample is equal to some fixed-in-advance distribution. We already saw Q–Q plots in Chap. 5 where the samples were compared to some theoretical distributions but in a descriptive fashion, without formal inference.
openaire   +1 more source

Length tests for goodnesss-of-fit

Biometrika, 1991
Consider an i.i.d. sample X 1,..., X n with distribution function F, which throughout is assumed to be twice continuously differentiable with support [0,1] and strictly positive derivative on [0,1]. Denote by $$0={X_{0:n}}\leqslant {X_{1:n}}\leqslant\cdots\leqslant{X_{n:n}}\leqslant{X_{n+1:n}}=1$$ (1) the order statistics, and the spacings by
Reschenhofer, Erhard, Bomze, Immanuel
openaire   +2 more sources

Testing Goodness of Fit

2022
E. L. Lehmann, Joseph P. Romano
openaire   +1 more source

»Smooth test» for goodness of fit

Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 1937
Abstract Dedicated to the memory of Karl Pearson (27 March 1857—27 April 1936) who originated the problem of a test for goodness of fit and was first to advance its solution.
openaire   +2 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy