Results 181 to 190 of about 496,028 (250)

Graham Priest's Mathematical Analysis of the Concept of Emptiness

History and Philosophy of Logic, 2017
In his article ‘The Structure of Emptiness’ (cf. Priest 2009) Graham Priest examines the concept of emptiness in the Mādhyamaka school of Nāgārjuna and his commentators Candrakīirti and Tsongkhapa from a mathematical point of view. The approach attempted in this article does not involve any commitment to Priest's more controversial dialethic Mādhyamaka
openaire   +1 more source

The Geography of Fundamentality

Oxford Scholarship Online, 2018
The dominant view amongst contemporary analytic metaphysicians working on notions of metaphysical dependence and the overarching structure of reality is one according to which that reality is hierarchically structured (the hierarchy thesis), well-founded
R. Bliss, G. Priest
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Are there True Contradictions? A Critical Discussion of Graham Priest's, Beyond the limits of thought

Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 1998
The present article critically examines three aspects of Graham Priest's dialetheic analysis of very important kinds of limitations (the limit of what can be expressed, described, conceived, known, or the limit of some operation or other). First, it is shown that Priest's considerations focusing on Hegel's account of the infinite cannot be sustained ...
Jürgen Dümont, Frank Mau
openaire   +1 more source

Graham Priest on the Contradiction in Kant’s Noumenon

Respublica Literaria
Graham Priest in Beyond the Limits of Thought claims that the notion of noumenon in Kant contains a true contradiction consisting in that Kant simultaneously denies the possibility of making judgments concerning noumena and makes nevertheless those judgments.
openaire   +1 more source

Further explanations of the G�del scenario of the mind ? A reply to Prof. Graham Priest

Synthese, 1993
In ``Consistency, mechanicalness and the logic of the mind'' [ibid. 90, 145-179 (1992; Zbl 0752.03002)], the author argued that arguments of \textit{J. Lucas} and the reviewer commit a fallacy of equivocation concerning the notion of proof. In ``Yu and your mind'' [ibid.
openaire   +1 more source

An introduction to non-classical logic

, 2008
G. Priest
semanticscholar   +1 more source

How Do You Apply Mathematics?

Axiomathes, 2022
G. Priest
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Doubt truth to be a liar

, 2006
G. Priest
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Minimally inconsistent LP

Studia Logica: An International Journal for Symbolic Logic, 1991
G. Priest
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Thinking the impossible

Philosophical Studies, 2016
G. Priest
semanticscholar   +1 more source