Results 111 to 120 of about 245,386 (226)

Saving 1968: Thinking with Habermas against Habermas

open access: yesPhaenEx, 2010
Taking Habermas’s Die nachholende Revolution as a foil, I contend that in his discussions of 1989, Habermas has misunderstood the nature of the anti-Communist revolutions. Comparing them to his writings on the public sphere and the student protest movements in Germany, I argue that the revolutions do not represent the triumph of capitalism anymore than
openaire   +3 more sources

The Diremption of Meaning

open access: yesModern Theology, EarlyView.
Abstract Examining work by Rowan Williams, this essay explores what he often refers to as the ‘difficulty’ of writing theology. The difficulty of theology lies in engaging the ruse of having ultimate answers to ultimate questions. The stakes are high: ‘God‐talk’ must concern itself with truth, with reality.
Graham Ward
wiley   +1 more source

UNA CRÍTICA A LAS TEORÍAS DE JUSTICIA GLOBAL: AL REALISMO, A RAWLS, HABERMAS Y POGGE

open access: yesIdeas y Valores, 2010
En este artículo se discuten algunas de las propuestas planteadas en la discusión contemporánea sobre los modelos normativos para un nuevo orden internacional.
Francisco Cortés Rodas
doaj  

With Habermas against Habermas. Deliberation without Consensus

open access: yesJournal of Deliberative Democracy, 2019
Habermas’s conception of deliberative democracy combines two concepts—deliberation and consensus—which, I argue, draw his theory in two opposite directions. While deliberation and the focus on communication can be read as a predominantly open element of his theory, consensus stands for closure. The process of deliberation contrasts Habermas’s normative
openaire   +2 more sources

Multiculturalism, Majority Rights and the Established Culture

open access: yesNations and Nationalism, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT Recent critiques of multiculturalism contend that it is the ethnic or cultural majority in Western democracies that is now most vulnerable to cultural and identity dissolution, thus entitling it to majority rights on much the same grounds that multiculturalists defend minority rights. These critiques follow and perpetuate the binary opposition
Geoffrey Brahm Levey
wiley   +1 more source

The European Public(s) and its Problems [PDF]

open access: yes, 2015
I present three versions –Grimm, Offe and Streeck—of a general argument that is often used to establish that the EU-institutions meets a legitimacy-disabling condition, the so called “no demos” argument (II), embedding them in the context of the ...
Mueller, Axel
core  

AI in Public Decision‐Making: A Philosophical and Practical Framework for Assessing and Weighing Harm and Benefit

open access: yesPublic Administration, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used in public decision‐making; yet existing governance tools often lack clear definitions of harm and benefit, practical methods for weighing competing values, and guidance for resolving value conflicts.
Karl de Fine Licht, Anna Folland
wiley   +1 more source

Possibilities for Social Equity Budgeting: Critical Insights From Bentham?

open access: yesPublic Administration, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT Considering prior ways of seeing and practical mobilisations of Social Equity Budgeting (SEB), we suggest that prior conceptualisation, research and practice can be advanced by reflecting on insights from the philosophical and political literature on equity and justice.
Laurence Ferry   +2 more
wiley   +1 more source

Tres enfoques Deontológicos Acerca de la Vida

open access: yesRevista Latinoamericana de Bioética, 2007
Este artículo presenta tres aproximaciones deontológicas a algunos problemas referidos al comienzo, el fin y la reproducción de la vida humana, así como a la preservación de la vida -humana y no humana- en el planeta.
Edgar Antonio López
doaj  

How deep a divide do we tolerate? Measuring the willingness to engage with differently minded others (WEDO)

open access: yesPolitical Psychology, EarlyView.
Abstract Fostering contact across political camps is crucial to combat affective polarization and to sustain healthy democratic discourse. Researchers therefore have become increasingly interested in better understanding the factors that promote or hamper political exchange.
Melissa Jauch   +3 more
wiley   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy