Results 111 to 120 of about 248,742 (263)

The Contemporary Debate on Secularization and Its Cross‐National Variation: A Systematization Through Topic Modeling

open access: yesJournal for the Scientific Study of Religion, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT Secularization is a key concept in the social scientific study of religion, yet its meaning remains ambiguous due to varied definitions produced in the literature. This article aims to provide a data‐driven systematization of the debate on religious change by analyzing 1638 academic articles published between 2001 and 2022 using structural ...
Valeria Rainero, Ruud Luijkx
wiley   +1 more source

The Diremption of Meaning

open access: yesModern Theology, EarlyView.
Abstract Examining work by Rowan Williams, this essay explores what he often refers to as the ‘difficulty’ of writing theology. The difficulty of theology lies in engaging the ruse of having ultimate answers to ultimate questions. The stakes are high: ‘God‐talk’ must concern itself with truth, with reality.
Graham Ward
wiley   +1 more source

AI in Public Decision‐Making: A Philosophical and Practical Framework for Assessing and Weighing Harm and Benefit

open access: yesPublic Administration, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used in public decision‐making; yet existing governance tools often lack clear definitions of harm and benefit, practical methods for weighing competing values, and guidance for resolving value conflicts.
Karl de Fine Licht, Anna Folland
wiley   +1 more source

Habermas: una propuesta para la teoría lingüística moderna

open access: yesForma y Función, 1991
En el siglo XX, pero particularmente en la última década, se han generado múltiples orientaciones intelectuales en las que se moviliza un profundo interés y necesidad en relación con la comprensión profunda de la condición humana; el fenómeno del ...
Pardo Abril Neyla Graciela
doaj  

Saving 1968: Thinking with Habermas against Habermas

open access: yesPhaenEx, 2010
Taking Habermas’s Die nachholende Revolution as a foil, I contend that in his discussions of 1989, Habermas has misunderstood the nature of the anti-Communist revolutions. Comparing them to his writings on the public sphere and the student protest movements in Germany, I argue that the revolutions do not represent the triumph of capitalism anymore than
openaire   +3 more sources

Between emancipation and domination: Habermasian reflections on the empowerment and disempowerment of the human subject [PDF]

open access: yes, 2009
Habermas’s ‘linguistic turn’ can be regarded as a systematic attempt to locate the normative foundations of critical theory in the rational foundations of language.
Susen, Simon
core  

Possibilities for Social Equity Budgeting: Critical Insights From Bentham?

open access: yesPublic Administration, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT Considering prior ways of seeing and practical mobilisations of Social Equity Budgeting (SEB), we suggest that prior conceptualisation, research and practice can be advanced by reflecting on insights from the philosophical and political literature on equity and justice.
Laurence Ferry   +2 more
wiley   +1 more source

UNA CRÍTICA A LAS TEORÍAS DE JUSTICIA GLOBAL: AL REALISMO, A RAWLS, HABERMAS Y POGGE

open access: yesIdeas y Valores, 2010
En este artículo se discuten algunas de las propuestas planteadas en la discusión contemporánea sobre los modelos normativos para un nuevo orden internacional.
Francisco Cortés Rodas
doaj  

With Habermas against Habermas. Deliberation without Consensus

open access: yesJournal of Deliberative Democracy, 2019
Habermas’s conception of deliberative democracy combines two concepts—deliberation and consensus—which, I argue, draw his theory in two opposite directions. While deliberation and the focus on communication can be read as a predominantly open element of his theory, consensus stands for closure. The process of deliberation contrasts Habermas’s normative
openaire   +2 more sources

A co-original approach towards law-making in the internet age [PDF]

open access: yes, 2012
There is an increasing interest in incorporating significant citizen participation into the law-making process by developing the use of the internet in the public sphere. However, no well-accepted e-participation model has prevailed.
Chen, Chi Shing
core  

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy