Тhe uncharted middle ground – when the patient asks, but the guideliness don’t answer [PDF]
Българска кардиология, 2021 Heart failure takes up an increasing portion of everyday cardiology practice. The accumulation of knowledge about the range of phenotypes and the therapeutic responses across the spectrum of heart failure leads to dynamic reconsideration of the best ...
Iskra Bayraktarova, Tzvetana Katova
doaj +3 more sources
Heart failure with mid-range left ventricular ejection fraction: New entity?
CorSalud, 2018 Currently, a new classification of patients with heart failure (HF) according to the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), the HF with mid-range LVEF (HFmrEF) between 40 and 49% is described. This is included in the previous classification of HF with LVEF greater than 50% or preserved LVEF (HFpEF) and HF with reduced LVEF (HFrEF), less than 40 ...
Patricia Javaloyes +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction: emerging frontiers in clinical characteristics, prognosis, and treatment [PDF]
Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2022 Heart failure (HF) is a complex clinical syndrome resulting from the impairment of ventricular filling or ejection of blood or both, leading to considerable morbidity and mortality. Based on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), the 2016 European
Zhi Shang, Xinyu Wang, Wei Gao
doaj +1 more source
Heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction: Two overlapping entities? Reply
CorSalud, 2019 Heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction: Two overlapping entities ...
Patricia Javaloyes +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Heart failure with mid-range or mildly reduced ejection fraction [PDF]
Nature Reviews Cardiology, 2021 Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) remains the major parameter for diagnosis, phenotyping, prognosis and treatment decisions in heart failure. The 2016 ESC heart failure guidelines introduced a third EF category for an EF of 40-49%, defined as heart failure with mid-range EF (HFmrEF).
Gianluigi Savarese +3 more
openaire +3 more sources
Similarities and Differences Between HFmrEF and HFpEF
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2021 The new guidelines classify heart failure (HF) into three subgroups based on the ejection fraction (EF): HF with reduced EF (HFrEF), HF with mid-range EF (HFmrEF), and HF with preserved EF (HFpEF).
Peixin Li +15 more
doaj +1 more source
Heart Failure with Mid-range Ejection Fraction——a Comprehension of the Disease [PDF]
Zhongguo quanke yixue, 2022 Heart failure is the final main battlefield of various cardiovascular diseases with huge harm, which can cause all kinds of arrhythmias and even sudden cardiac death. The 2016 ESC guidelines formally define heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction (
RUAN Zheng, HUANG Jianyu, JIANG Wencai, CHEN Meixiang, QIN Changyu, XU Lin
doaj +1 more source
Trajectories of Waist-to-Hip Ratio and Adverse Outcomes in Heart Failure with Mid-Range Ejection Fraction. [PDF]
Obes Facts, 2020 Background: Waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) is a strong predictor of mortality in patients with heart failure (HF). However, common WHR trajectories are not well established in HF with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF) persons, and their relationship to ...
Gao F +5 more
europepmc +2 more sources
Comorbidities in heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction [PDF]
European Journal of Internal Medicine, 2017 Dear Sir, The recent Guidelines of heart failure (HF) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) propose an emerging classification of HF according to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Namely, patients with LVEF between 40 and 50% are classified in an intermediate group termed HF with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF). Although the authors
Perez-Calvo, Juan Ignacio +3 more
openaire +3 more sources
Heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction: characterization of patients from the PINNACLE Registry®. [PDF]
ESC Heart Fail, 2019 Aims Guidelines for management of patients with heart failure with mid‐range ejection fraction [HFmrEF; left ventricular EF (LVEF) 41–49%] do not exist. Disagreement exists whether HFmrEF should be considered a distinct group. The aim of this study is to
Ibrahim NE +7 more
europepmc +2 more sources