Results 61 to 70 of about 10,714 (163)

Workplace interventions to improve work ability: A systematic review and meta-analysis of their effectiveness

open access: yesScandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 2018
OBJECTIVE: Extended working lives due to an ageing population will necessitate the maintenance of work ability across the life course. This systematic review aimed to analyze whether workplace interventions positively impact work ability.
Jodi Oakman   +4 more
doaj   +1 more source

The contribution of human factors and ergonomics to the design and delivery of safe future healthcare. [PDF]

open access: yesFuture Healthc J, 2021
Sujan M   +6 more
europepmc   +1 more source

A human factors and ergonomics approach to conceptualizing care work among caregivers of people with dementia. [PDF]

open access: yesAppl Ergon, 2022
Werner NE   +4 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Occupational Health and Safety Reporting in the Top 100 Australian Companies: Does Organisational Risk Profile Matter?

open access: yesAdministrative Sciences
Increasingly, good quality and safe working conditions that promote employee health are expected by stakeholders. The aim of this study is to examine the extent and quality of occupational health and safety (OHS) reporting in the Top 100 companies listed
Jodi Oakman   +3 more
doaj   +1 more source

Wet-work Exposure: A Main Risk Factor for Occupational Hand Dermatitis

open access: yesSafety and Health at Work, 2014
Wet-work can be defined as activities where workers have to immerse their hands in liquids for >2 hours per shift, or wear waterproof (occlusive) gloves for a corresponding amount of time, or wash their hands >20 times per shift.
Ali Behroozy, Tessa G. Keegel
doaj   +1 more source

Human factors and ergonomics at time of crises: the Italian experience coping with COVID-19. [PDF]

open access: yesInt J Qual Health Care, 2021
Albolino S   +6 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Ergonomics & Human factors: fade of a discipline

open access: yesErgonomics
In this commentary, we argue that the field of Ergonomics and Human Factors (EHF) has the tendency to present itself as a thriving and impactful science, while in reality, it is losing credibility. We assert that EHF science (1) has introduced terminology that is internally inconsistent and hardly predictive-valid, (2) has virtually no impact on ...
J.C.F. de Winter, Y.B. Eisma
openaire   +2 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy