Results 171 to 180 of about 129,234 (223)
The importance of enworlded selfhood for understanding chronic pain-related suffering. [PDF]
Svenaeus F.
europepmc +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
2019
Edmund Husserl, generally regarded as the founding figure of the philosophical movement of phenomenology—or, more precisely, transcendental phenomenology—exerted an enormous influence on the course of twentieth- and twenty-first-century philosophy. This influence was both positive and negative.
Rudolf Bernet +15 more
+5 more sources
Edmund Husserl, generally regarded as the founding figure of the philosophical movement of phenomenology—or, more precisely, transcendental phenomenology—exerted an enormous influence on the course of twentieth- and twenty-first-century philosophy. This influence was both positive and negative.
Rudolf Bernet +15 more
+5 more sources
Husserl’s concept of the ‘transcendental person’: Another look at the Husserl–Heidegger relationship [PDF]
This paper offers a further look at Husserl’s late thought on the transcendental subject and the Husserl–Heidegger relationship. It attempts a reconstruction of how Husserl hoped to assert his own thoughts on subjectivity vis-à-vis Heidegger, while also ...
Luft, Sebastian
exaly +2 more sources
2023
Abstract We live in a time when a universal philosophy that would comprehend human relations to the world is now a bygone dream, as Husserl writes in Die Krisis in 1935. At the end of his life, he looks back at his constant efforts to defend the role of reason in relation to science and philosophy.
openaire +1 more source
Abstract We live in a time when a universal philosophy that would comprehend human relations to the world is now a bygone dream, as Husserl writes in Die Krisis in 1935. At the end of his life, he looks back at his constant efforts to defend the role of reason in relation to science and philosophy.
openaire +1 more source
Husserl Against Heidegger Against Husserl
2007So many ways to say that one is against someone, especially in the context of also saying that one agrees with or follows someone (as we shall see below). How far does one have to be no longer with a thinker’s thought to be against that thinker’s thought?
openaire +1 more source

