Results 181 to 190 of about 130,342 (232)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
SynthÈse, 2006
It is argued that Husserl was an “externalist” in at least one sense. For it is argued that Husserl held that genuinely perceptual experiences—that is to say, experiences that are of some real object in the world—differ intrinsically, essentially and as a kind from any hallucinatory experiences.
exaly +2 more sources
It is argued that Husserl was an “externalist” in at least one sense. For it is argued that Husserl held that genuinely perceptual experiences—that is to say, experiences that are of some real object in the world—differ intrinsically, essentially and as a kind from any hallucinatory experiences.
exaly +2 more sources
2017
We aim at clarifying to what extent the work of the German mathematician Ernst Schroder (1841–1902) on the algebra of logic is taken into consideration and rehashed in the work of the early Husserl, focusing on Husserl’s 1891 Review of the first volume of Schroder’s monumental Vorlesungen uber die Algebra der Logik (Exakte Logik) and on Husserl’s text ...
Centrone, Stefania, MINARI, PIERLUIGI
openaire +2 more sources
We aim at clarifying to what extent the work of the German mathematician Ernst Schroder (1841–1902) on the algebra of logic is taken into consideration and rehashed in the work of the early Husserl, focusing on Husserl’s 1891 Review of the first volume of Schroder’s monumental Vorlesungen uber die Algebra der Logik (Exakte Logik) and on Husserl’s text ...
Centrone, Stefania, MINARI, PIERLUIGI
openaire +2 more sources
Husserl Studies, 1984
My investigation into the nature of the modal concepts Husserl employs is motivated by the expectation that we may thereby be able to gain a deeper understanding of some of his crucial philosophical moves. The immediate stimulus for such an enquiry, however, was provided by Jaakko Hintikka’s book The Intentions of Intentionality in which he attempts an
openaire +1 more source
My investigation into the nature of the modal concepts Husserl employs is motivated by the expectation that we may thereby be able to gain a deeper understanding of some of his crucial philosophical moves. The immediate stimulus for such an enquiry, however, was provided by Jaakko Hintikka’s book The Intentions of Intentionality in which he attempts an
openaire +1 more source
Husserl’s Rewriting of Empathy in Husserl
2014In all of Edmund Husserl’s published writings, “empathy” is a part of the superstructure of intersubjectivity (community), and in no case is it a primitive function at the foundation of intersubjectivity. Edith Stein’s use and mention of “empathy” are in effect passed over by Husserl even as he uses most of the underlying empathic distinctions.
openaire +1 more source
2019
Edmund Husserl, generally regarded as the founding figure of the philosophical movement of phenomenology—or, more precisely, transcendental phenomenology—exerted an enormous influence on the course of twentieth- and twenty-first-century philosophy. This influence was both positive and negative.
+4 more sources
Edmund Husserl, generally regarded as the founding figure of the philosophical movement of phenomenology—or, more precisely, transcendental phenomenology—exerted an enormous influence on the course of twentieth- and twenty-first-century philosophy. This influence was both positive and negative.
+4 more sources
2023
Abstract We live in a time when a universal philosophy that would comprehend human relations to the world is now a bygone dream, as Husserl writes in Die Krisis in 1935. At the end of his life, he looks back at his constant efforts to defend the role of reason in relation to science and philosophy.
openaire +1 more source
Abstract We live in a time when a universal philosophy that would comprehend human relations to the world is now a bygone dream, as Husserl writes in Die Krisis in 1935. At the end of his life, he looks back at his constant efforts to defend the role of reason in relation to science and philosophy.
openaire +1 more source
Husserl Against Heidegger Against Husserl
2007So many ways to say that one is against someone, especially in the context of also saying that one agrees with or follows someone (as we shall see below). How far does one have to be no longer with a thinker’s thought to be against that thinker’s thought?
openaire +1 more source