Results 1 to 10 of about 99,324 (303)

Accuracy of Three Impression Materials on the Totally Edentulous Maxilla: In Vitro/In Silico Comparative Analysis. [PDF]

Materials (Basel), 2020
Zarone F, Ruggiero G, Di Mauro MI, Spagnuolo G, Ferrari M, Sorrentino R.   +5 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Comparative Evaluation of Ozone Water and Glutaraldehyde on Surface Detail Reproduction of Vinyl Polyether Silicone Impression Materials at Different Time Intervals.

J Pharm Bioallied Sci
Shankar K, Dandekeri S, Shetty R, Fernandes K, Shetty SK, Ragher M.   +5 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Evaluation of Dimensional Change in Different Elastomeric Impression Materials Used in Implants: An Original Research.

J Pharm Bioallied Sci
Rajput M, Baranikrishnan J, Mansoor MA, Thakkar R, Karre S, Verma J.   +5 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Efficacy of Ozone, UV Radiation, Herbal and Glutaraldehyde Method for Sterilisation of Elastomeric Impression Materials for Orthodontic and Prosthodontic procedures.

J Pharm Bioallied Sci
Ashil AM, Sharma A, Faiz MK, Garhnayak M, Mathar MI, Anupama T, Mahalakshmi G, Sharma T.   +7 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Materials for prosthesis and orthosis. Impression materials. With emphasis on dental impression materials.

Bulletin of the Japanese Society of Prosthetics and Orthotics, 1988
openaire   +1 more source

Radiopacity of elastomeric impression materials

Australian Dental Journal, 1994
AbstractThe purpose of this study was to measure and classify the radiopacity of various elastomeric impression materials available on the open market and to compare their appearance in radiographs of the oral tissues. In order to measure and classify their radiopacity, twenty‐eight specimens of various materials were placed and exposed on film ...
N, Parissis, D, Iakovidis, S, Chirakis, A, Tsirlis   +3 more
exaly   +3 more sources

Radiopacity of impression materials

Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, 1979
The radiographic densitites of twenty-six impression materials were measured and the values expressed as an equivalent thickness of aluminum. Under simulated clinical conditions, only ten of the materials tested could be consistently distinguished from the bone structure in periapical radiographs. It was far more dificult to detect objects with beveled
S T, Elíasson, B, Haasken
openaire   +2 more sources

Cytotoxicity of impression materials

The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1993
The purpose of this study was to assess the potential cytotoxicity of impression materials. The impression material brands tested included Impregum, Reprosil, Surgident, Permlastic, Jeltrate Regular and Jeltrate Fast Set. These impression materials and their components were tested for their possible cytotoxic effects by three different methods.
R J, Sydiskis, D E, Gerhardt
openaire   +2 more sources

Impression Materials and Virus

The Journal of the American Dental Association, 1991
Results of this study indicate that impression materials vary in their ability to absorb and retain virus. Disinfection procedures specific for each material or groups of materials should be developed.
D E, Gerhardt, R J, Sydiskis
openaire   +2 more sources