Results 171 to 180 of about 11,812,885 (209)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Interaural level differences and the level-meter model
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2002The interaural level difference (ILD) plays a significant role in sound localization. However, the definition of ILD for noise is open to some interpretation because it is not obvious how to deal with the inevitable level fluctuations. In this article, the ILD is interpreted as an energylike (time-integrated) measure of stimulus level, independent of ...
William M, Hartmann, Zachary A, Constan
openaire +2 more sources
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2022
The two primary cues to sound-source location on the horizontal plane are interaural differences in time (ITDs) and in level (ILDs). Here, we asked whether the ability to discriminate small changes in each of these interaural cues differs between the sexes.
Beverly A. Wright, Huanping Dai
openaire +1 more source
The two primary cues to sound-source location on the horizontal plane are interaural differences in time (ITDs) and in level (ILDs). Here, we asked whether the ability to discriminate small changes in each of these interaural cues differs between the sexes.
Beverly A. Wright, Huanping Dai
openaire +1 more source
Individual Differences in Sensitivity to Interaural Differences in Time and Level
Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1973Previous research had indicated the existence of two groups—people more sensitive to interaural time differences than to interaural level (intensity) differences and people more sensitive to level differences than to time differences. A population of undergraduates was surveyed in an attempt to estimate the relative proportions of people in the two ...
D, McFadden, L A, Jeffress, W E, Russell
openaire +2 more sources
The precedence effect: Is it the same for interaural time and interaural level differences?
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2020Until recently, it was believed that the precedence effect operated for both interaural time and interaural level differences (ITDs and ILDs). Stecker and Brown (2010) demonstrated the absence of precedence effects for ILDs under conditions producing strong effects for ITDs.
Raymond H. Dye, Sarah E. Darnell
openaire +1 more source
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2023 Abstract Purpose This study investigated whether an interaural delay, e.g. caused by the processing latency of a hearing device, can affect sensitivity to interaural level differences (ILDs) in normal hearing subjects or cochlear implant (CI) users with contralateral normal hearing (SSD-CI).
Tobias Weissgerber +2 more
exaly +4 more sources
Interaural coherence and the lateralization of noise by interaural level differences
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2001Coherent noise, with an interaural cross correlation of unity, and incoherent noise, where signals to left and right ears are independent, sound very different. The former produces a compact lateralized image. The latter produces a diffuse image that fills the head. Nevertheless, listening experiments show that coherent and incoherent noise images seem
William M. Hartmann, Zachary A. Constan
openaire +1 more source
Discrimination of interaural differences of level as a function of frequency
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1988Discrimination of interaural differences of level (IDLs) was measured for pure tones as a function of frequency and as a function of the interaural difference of phase or level of a standard. Varying the interaural difference of the standard was assumed to change the lateral position of its intracranial image. Threshold IDLs were approximately constant
W A, Yost, R H, Dye
openaire +2 more sources
Differences of Interaural Phase and Level in Detection and Lateralization
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1971By employing the same narrow band of noise (50 Hz wide, centered at 500 Hz) as both masker and signal, and by introducing a phase-shifting network between the masking and signal channels, it is possible to control the phase angle, α, between the two. For a given signal-to-noise ratio, controlling the phase angle, α, controls the relative magnitudes of ...
L A, Jeffress, D, McFadden
openaire +2 more sources
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1972
Detectability was measured as a function of signal duration for a dichotic condition in which there was only an interaural difference in level and for one in which there was only an interaural difference in time. For four subjects, performance improved as duration increased, and it did so in essentially the same way for the two dichotic conditions ...
Dennis McFadden, Alan D. Sharpley
openaire +1 more source
Detectability was measured as a function of signal duration for a dichotic condition in which there was only an interaural difference in level and for one in which there was only an interaural difference in time. For four subjects, performance improved as duration increased, and it did so in essentially the same way for the two dichotic conditions ...
Dennis McFadden, Alan D. Sharpley
openaire +1 more source
Interaction in the perceptual processing of interaural time and level differences
Hearing Research, 2006Phillips and Hall [Psychophysical evidence for adaptation of central auditory processors for interaural differences in time and level, Hear. Res., 202 (2005) 188-199.] recently described the frequency-specific, selective adaptation of perceptual channels for interaural differences in level (ILD) and time (ITD).
Dennis P, Phillips +2 more
openaire +2 more sources