Results 161 to 170 of about 16,720,484 (198)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

The precedence effect: Is it the same for interaural time and interaural level differences?

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2020
Until recently, it was believed that the precedence effect operated for both interaural time and interaural level differences (ITDs and ILDs). Stecker and Brown (2010) demonstrated the absence of precedence effects for ILDs under conditions producing strong effects for ITDs.
Raymond H. Dye, Sarah E. Darnell
openaire   +1 more source

Localization by interaural time difference (ITD): Effects of interaural frequency mismatch

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1999
A commonly accepted physiological model for lateralization of low-frequency sounds by interaural time delay (ITD) stipulates that binaural comparison neurons receive input from frequency-matched channels from each ear. Here, the effects of hypothetical interaural frequency mismatches on this model are reported. For this study, the cat’s auditory system
B H, Bonham, E R, Lewis
openaire   +2 more sources

Changes in interaural time sensitivity with interaural level differences in the inferior colliculus

Hearing Research, 2007
We measured interaural time difference (ITD) sensitivity of 72 cells in the inferior colliculus of the anaesthetised guinea pig as a function of frequency and interaural level difference (ILD). For many units there was a "null" frequency, where varying the ILD made no difference to the position of the peak of the ITD sensitivity.
Alan R, Palmer   +2 more
openaire   +2 more sources

A sex difference and learning in the discrimination of interaural-level differences but not interaural-time differences in naïve listeners

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2022
The two primary cues to sound-source location on the horizontal plane are interaural differences in time (ITDs) and in level (ILDs). Here, we asked whether the ability to discriminate small changes in each of these interaural cues differs between the sexes.
Beverly A. Wright, Huanping Dai
openaire   +1 more source

Just Noticeable Differences for Changes of Interaural Time Differences as a Function of Interaural Time Differences

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1959
The just noticeable differences for changes of interaural time differences between two bursts of noise were investigated as a function of the interaural time difference of the first (reference) burst. Four normal hearing subjects listened through earphones to time differences between ears which were varied by electrical means.
openaire   +1 more source

A rapid measurement for the effect of interaural mismatch on interaural time difference sensitivity

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2021
Cochlear implant (CI) users often have difficulties utilizing binaural cues such as interaural time difference (ITD) because of a mismatch in terms of the cochlear stimulation location in each ear. Methods for measuring this mismatch often rely on psychophysical approaches that can require hours of testing.
Justin M. Aronoff   +4 more
openaire   +1 more source

Detectability of Interaural Time Differences and Interaural Level Differences as a Function of Signal Duration

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1972
Detectability was measured as a function of signal duration for a dichotic condition in which there was only an interaural difference in level and for one in which there was only an interaural difference in time. For four subjects, performance improved as duration increased, and it did so in essentially the same way for the two dichotic conditions ...
Dennis McFadden, Alan D. Sharpley
openaire   +1 more source

Role of time-varying interaural time and interaural intensitive differences in the detection of tones

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1975
Detection of a low-frequency tonal signal in the presence of various types of masker was studied using a two-alternative temporal forced-choice paradigm. The first experiment employed a tonal masker of the same frequency as the signal (500 Hz). The phase angle between signal and masker was either 0°, 45°, 90°, or 135°.
D. Wesley Grantham, Donald E. Robinson
openaire   +1 more source

Differential lateralization interference for interaural time and interaural level differences

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1991
Lateralization thresholds were obtained in a 21FC task using 200-ms noise bands presented with either an interaural time or level difference. The elevation in lateralization threshold (interference) caused by a simultaneously presented noise band was measured.
M. Heller, Laurie, Richards, Virginia M.
openaire   +1 more source

Discriminability of Interaural Time Difference

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1953
Using earphone presentation and electrical lag lines which allow precise control of time delays, measurements were made of interaural time difference thresholds for pure tones and noise bands. The time difference threshold is here defined as the minimal change in interaural time difference which elicits a perceptible shift in the location of the sound ...
openaire   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy