Results 51 to 60 of about 252,334 (205)

Soft X‐Ray Telescopes of the Future: Trade Study of Micro‐Pore Optic Size for Imaging Dayside Magnetospheric Features

Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Volume 131, Issue 11, November 2026.
Abstract This study compares the capabilities of different sized micro‐pore optic (MPO) based soft X‐ray telescopes and their ability to observe features and phenomena of the magnetosheath at Earth. The basic science is the starting point and different instrument properties are applied to test which would be capable of studying features of the near ...
Emil A. Atz, Brian M. Walsh, Kip D. Kuntz, Maxime Grandin, Markus Battarbee, Yann Pfau‐Kempf, Minna Palmroth   +6 more
wiley   +1 more source

The Spatial Localization of Storm‐Time ULF Waves Due To Plasmaspheric Plumes

Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Volume 131, Issue 11, November 2026.
Abstract The generation and propagation of Ultra Low Frequency (ULF) waves are intrinsically coupled to the cold plasma population in the terrestrial magnetosphere. During geomagnetic storms, extreme reconfigurations of the cold plasma create a complex and dynamic system that drastically modifies this coupling.
J. K. Sandhu, K. R. Murphy, I. J. Rae, T. K. Yeoman, A. W. Degeling, A. Osmane, D. P. Hartley, M.‐T. Walach   +7 more
wiley   +1 more source

Velocity profiles of interplanetary shocks [PDF]

, 1983
The type 2 radio burst was identified as a shock propagating through solar corona. Radio emission from shocks travelling through the interplanetary (IP) medium was observed.
Cane, H. V.
core  

Shock waves propagation in the turbulent interplanetary plasma [PDF]

Advances in Space Research, 1996
AbstractEffect of turbulence on interplanetary shock waves propagation is considered. It is shown that background turbulence results in the additional shock wave deceleration which may be comparable with the deceleration due to plasma sweeping. The turbulent deceleration is connected with the energy losses due to the strong turbulence amplification ...
Chashei, I. V., Shishov, V. I.
openaire   +2 more sources

Suprathermal Electron Acceleration Comparison of the Venusian and Terrestrial Bow Shocks

Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Volume 131, Issue 11, November 2026.
Abstract We study suprathermal electron acceleration at the Venusian bow shock using the Parker Solar Probe gravity assists and the Venus Express spacecraft mission. The acceleration is classified by measuring the maximum energy and the power‐law spectral slope (index) of the electron phase space density immediately downstream of the shocks for ...
M. Lindberg, H. Hietala, S. Nyberg, Y. Futaana, H. George   +4 more
wiley   +1 more source

Editorial to the Special Issue “Propagation of Coronal Mass Ejections”

Universe, 2023
Coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and their associated shocks are one of the main drivers of heliosphere variability, causing both interplanetary and planetary perturbations [...]
Mateja Dumbović, Fang Shen
doaj   +1 more source

Characteristics of Solar Wind Density Depletions During Solar Cycles 23 and 24 [PDF]

Journal of Astronomy and Space Sciences, 2017
Solar wind density depletions are phenomena that solar wind density is rapidly decreased and keep the state. They are generally believed to be caused by the interplanetary (IP) shocks.
Keunchan Park, Jeongwoo Lee, Yu Yi, Jaejin Lee, Jongdae Sohn   +4 more
doaj   +1 more source

Is Magnetic Reconnection Dominantly Spatially or Temporally Variable: First Results From TRACERS

Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Volume 131, Issue 11, November 2026.
Abstract The Tandem Reconnection And Cusp Electrodynamics Reconnaissance Satellites (TRACERS) small explorer mission was designed to: Determine whether magnetopause reconnection is primarily spatially or temporally variable for a range of solar wind conditions. Observations from the Analyzers for Cusp Ions (ACIs) on the two TRACERS spacecrafts are used
S. A. Fuselier, C. A. Kletzing, D. M. Miles, S. R. Bounds, J. B. Bonnell, I. H. Cairns, H. Cao, J. D. Furman, R. G. Gomez, K. Goodrich, J. S. Halekas, G. Hospodarsky, Y. Lin, J. LaBelle, K. LLera, J. Mukherjee, M. Øieroset, S. M. Petrinec, R. Roglans, O. Santolik, R. Strangeway, K. J. Trattner, S. K. Vines   +22 more
wiley   +1 more source

Interplanetary Shocks between 0.3 and 1.0 au: Helios 1 and 2 Observations

The Astrophysical Journal, 2023
The Helios 1 (H1) and Helios 2 (H2) spacecraft measured the solar winds at a distance between ∼0.3 and 1.0 au from the Sun. With increasing heliocentric distance ( r _h ), the plasma speed is found to increase at ∼34–40 km s ^−1 au ^−1 and the density ...
Rajkumar Hajra, Bruce T. Tsurutani, Gurbax S. Lakhina, Quanming Lu, Aimin Du, Lican Shan   +5 more
doaj   +1 more source

Impact angle control of interplanetary shock geoeffectiveness [PDF]

Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 2014
AbstractWe use Open Geospace General Circulation Model global MHD simulations to study the nightside magnetospheric, magnetotail, and ionospheric responses to interplanetary (IP) fast forward shocks. Three cases are presented in this study: two inclined oblique shocks, hereafter IOS‐1 and IOS‐2, where the latter has a Mach number twice stronger than ...
Oliveira, D. M., Raeder, J.
openaire   +2 more sources