Results 91 to 100 of about 109 (105)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Intime conviction et doute. Au-delà d’une antinomie apparente… Ce que révèle leur étude comparée
Annales Médico-psychologiques, revue psychiatrique, 2015Resume L’intime conviction est analysee comme une certitude morale qui devrait etre incompatible avec tout doute dans l’esprit du juge. En fait, le doute ne peut pas etre totalement exclu, de sorte que l’intime conviction est un moyen de surmonter le doute, ce qui permet au juge de prendre sa decision.
openaire +2 more sources
Journal of Criminal Justice, 2007
The effectiveness of harsher sanctions for domestic violence offenders is an important topic given legislative trends in “getting tough” with these offenders. This article takes a rare look at felony domestic violence, specifically felony assaults on female intimates, with an analysis of whether conviction, jail, and imprisonment are related to the ...
openaire +1 more source
The effectiveness of harsher sanctions for domestic violence offenders is an important topic given legislative trends in “getting tough” with these offenders. This article takes a rare look at felony domestic violence, specifically felony assaults on female intimates, with an analysis of whether conviction, jail, and imprisonment are related to the ...
openaire +1 more source
NEUROSCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE AND ITS EFFECTS ON THE PRINCIPLES OF EQUALITY OF ARMS AND INTIME CONVICTION IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS [PDF]
, 2023 Neuroscientific evidence has an increasing impact on fact-finding in criminal proceedings. Yet, the reliability of neuroscientific knowledge cannot be entrusted entirely to the experts but must be inspected within the trial, according to its principles, rules, and epistemological canons.
openaire
Females convicted for intimate partner homicide in Portugal: The other way around.
2023openaire +2 more sources
2007
The proper reasoning is an essential part of court judgments, so also the ECHR. However, when explaining factual findings, judges basically have on disposal two strategies - one based on the conviction (fr. - intime conviction), and one based on the burden of proof rules. The lecture discusses the consequences of both strategies.
openaire
The proper reasoning is an essential part of court judgments, so also the ECHR. However, when explaining factual findings, judges basically have on disposal two strategies - one based on the conviction (fr. - intime conviction), and one based on the burden of proof rules. The lecture discusses the consequences of both strategies.
openaire