Results 231 to 240 of about 37,298 (279)

Prefrontal activity during IOWA Gambling Task in young adult women

open access: hybrid
Ferran Balada   +4 more
openalex   +1 more source

Decision-Making in Alzheimer’s Disease: The Role of Working Memory and Executive Functions in the Iowa Gambling Task and in Tasks Inspired by Everyday Situations

Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, 2022
Background: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) negatively impacts patients’ ability to make advantageous decisions, i.e., a core ability contributing to the preservation of autonomy.
Fanny Gaubert, C. Borg, H. Chainay
semanticscholar   +1 more source

The Performance of College Students on the Iowa Gambling Task: Differences Between Scoring Approaches

Assessment (Odessa, Fla.), 2021
The Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) is one of the most common behavioral decision-making tasks used in clinical and research settings. Less-than-expected performance among healthy adults generates concerns about the validity of this task, and it is possible the
Wesley R. Barnhart, Melissa T. Buelow
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Iowa Gambling Task in Parkinson's Disease

Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 2010
Cognitive impairments are common in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) from the early stages. Recent studies reported that medicated PD patients have poor performances, with respect to age-matched healthy controls, in a decision-making task like the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), which detects the ability to alter choice behavior in response to ...
Poletti M   +2 more
openaire   +4 more sources

FRN and P3 during the Iowa gambling task: The importance of gender.

Psychophysiology, 2020
Previous research has shown gender-related psychobiological differences in risky and competitive strategies that affect win and loss outcomes. In addition, some studies have found differences in the decision-making process, with women taking longer to ...
Ruth Garrido-Chaves   +5 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Performance and awareness in the Iowa Gambling Task

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2014
AbstractNewell & Shanks (N&S) conclude that healthy participants learn to differentiate between the good and bad decks of the Iowa Gambling Task, and that healthy participants even have conscious knowledge about the task's payoff structure. Improved methods of analysis and new behavioral findings suggest that this conclusion is premature.
Steingroever, H., Wagenmakers, E.-J.
openaire   +4 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy