Results 81 to 90 of about 8,971 (247)
Contact Allergy to Textile Dye Mix in Italy: A SIDAPA Multicentre Observational Study
From January 2020 to March 2025, 7633 patients (69.2% females) underwent patch test with textile dye mix 6.6%. 281 (3.7%, F 77.2%) resulted positive (59.8% relevant), mainly non‐occupational (89.9%). The observed prevalence (3.7%), even if with decreasing trend, exceeds that of previous Italian (1.5%) and European (2%–3%) studies.
Maria Michela Lauriola +22 more
wiley +1 more source
Skin disorders comprise more than 35% of all occupationally related diseases. 90-95% of work-related dermatoses are contact dermatitis. Effects of occupational dermatitis in the lives of workers are substantial.
Fatemeh Fathi, Moslem Jafarpoor
doaj
Contact dermatitis is a common inflammatory skin disease that often requires prescription therapy and is associated with adverse reactions. Omega fatty acids have been recognized for their anti-inflammatory effect and could serve as a safer option in ...
Magdalena Ivic +9 more
doaj +1 more source
Stratum Corneum Biomarkers for Differentiating Irritant and Allergic Contact Dermatitis
From 126 patients with irritant or allergic contact dermatitis of the hands, stratum corneum tape strips from patch test sites and lesional hand skin were collected and analysed for barrier and immune biomarkers, and machine learning models were trained to separate ICD from ACD.
F. L. de Boer +10 more
wiley +1 more source
One hundred patients with suspected allergic contact dermatitis to diabetes devices were patch tested with a dedicated diabetes device screening series containing most allergens identified to date in glucose sensors, insulin pumps, and insulin infusion sets.
Norbertus A. Ipenburg +4 more
wiley +1 more source
Irritant contact dermatitis to quarantine stamps
Rashi Satyanarayan Soni +1 more
doaj +1 more source
Post-Occlusion Application of Skin Protective Creams Does Not Affect Occlusion-Induced Barrier Changes: A Randomized Controlled Experimental Study. [PDF]
Post‐occlusion application of protective creams did not consistently reduce occlusion‐induced skin barrier impairment after glove use. Protective efficacy probably depends on formulation and timing, with only immediate pre‐irritant application showing a significant reduction in SLS‐induced barrier disruption.
Gina M +4 more
europepmc +2 more sources

