Results 41 to 50 of about 1,072,853 (211)
Necessity and Liability: On an Honour-Based Justification for Defensive Harming [PDF]
, 2016 This paper considers whether victims can justify what appears to be unnecessary defensive harming by reference to an honour-based justification. I argue that such an account faces serious problems: the honour-based justification cannot permit, first ...
Bowen, Joseph
core +1 more source
Philosophy &Public Affairs, Volume 53, Issue 4, Page 344-353, Fall 2025.ABSTRACT In the wake of widescale deadly attacks, desire and support for military revenge are prevalent. Rather than dismissing it as due to ignorance, moral depravity or heat of the moment, I propose that support for military revenge is more charitably understood as support for a “retributive revenge war,” aimed at inflicting deserved harms on the ...
Uri Eran
wiley +1 more source
Advanced Healthcare Materials, Volume 14, Issue 25, September 26, 2025.Imaging pH in a live rabbit at the surface of a sensor‐coated titanium plate using X‐ray excited luminescent chemical imaging (XELCI). A raster scanning X‐ray beam generates radioluminescence from a spot on the sensor, and the luminescence passes through the tissue and is collected at two wavelengths to determine local pH.
Unaiza Uzair +6 more
wiley +1 more source
Putting the War Back in Just War Theory: A Critique of Examples [PDF]
, 2017 Analytic just war theorists often attempt to construct ideal theories of military justice on the basis of intuitions about imaginary and sometimes outlandish examples, often taken from non-military contexts. This article argues for a sharp curtailment of
Mark, Rigstad
core
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Volume 111, Issue 2, Page 676-695, September 2025.Abstract According to the Wrong Restriction, we are liable to defensive harm only when we threaten to wrong others. While attractive on a first pass, we argue that plausible philosophical claims make the Wrong Restriction difficult to accept. In its place, we offer the Impermissibility Restriction, according to which one is liable to defensive harm ...
Joseph Bowen, James Goodrich
wiley +1 more source
Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 106, Issue 2, Page 96-106, June 2025.ABSTRACT If a warring side may fight in pursuit of an aim up to some proportionality‐respecting limit, then an important question is whether that side is morally required to stop fighting when it reaches that limit, despite not yet having attained its aim.
Gerald Lang
wiley +1 more source
Against “the badness of death” [PDF]
I argue that excessive reliance on the notion of “the badness of death” tends to lead theorists astray when thinking about healthcare prioritisation. I survey two examples: the confusion surrounding the “time-relative interests account” of the badness of
Greaves, Hilary
core +1 more source
Environmental Just Wars: Jus ad Bellum and the Natural Environment
Journal of Applied Philosophy, Volume 42, Issue 2, Page 620-638, May 2025.ABSTRACT War is bad for the environment, yet the environmental ramifications of warfare have not been widely addressed by just war theorists and revisionist philosophers of war. The law and legal scholars have paid more attention to protecting nature during armed conflict.
Tamar Meisels
wiley +1 more source
Individual Virtues, Social Movements, and Allyship in the Sphere of Intellectual Disability
Journal of Social Philosophy, EarlyView.
Tommy Ness
wiley +1 more source