Results 171 to 180 of about 44,058 (233)
Development of A Surgery-Related Pressure Injury Risk Assessment Scale (SURPIRAS): A Methodological Study. [PDF]
J Clin NursKonateke S, Güner Şİ.
europepmc +1 more source
A survey of the allocation of scarce resources in Türkiye during the COVID-19 pandemic: Which criteria did healthcare professionals prioritize? [PDF]
Dev World BioethAydin Er R, Çevik Nasirlier G.
europepmc +1 more source
Resource-rational psychopathology. [PDF]
Behav NeurosciBari BA, Gershman SJ.
europepmc +1 more source
Targeted genetic therapies for inherited disorders that affect both cardiac and skeletal muscle. [PDF]
Exp PhysiolPsaras Y, Toepfer CN.
europepmc +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
The Economic Journal, 1990
This paper considers the contributions of J. R. Hicks to economic theory. Copyright 1990 by Royal Economic Society.
openaire +1 more source
This paper considers the contributions of J. R. Hicks to economic theory. Copyright 1990 by Royal Economic Society.
openaire +1 more source
Hicks's ‘conversion’ – from J. R. to John
2009J.R. Hicks, the young, is the father of the IS-LM framework of analysis - that framework which killed the Keynesian Revolution. John Hicks, the old, repudiated the analysis that J.R. Hicks made. That's why Hicks changed name from J.R. to John. The article studies the underlined theoretical motives that provoke this profound change of mind.
Pasinetti, Luigi Lodovico +1 more
openaire +3 more sources
1989
It is unclear to me precisely how the Kant—Russell line of argument shows that my version of the OA breaks down — that is, is either formally invalid, informally invalid, or unsound. Nevertheless, the thrust of Hick’s objection is clear — it is illicit and precritical to speak, as the OA does, of existence ‘in the mind’.
+4 more sources
It is unclear to me precisely how the Kant—Russell line of argument shows that my version of the OA breaks down — that is, is either formally invalid, informally invalid, or unsound. Nevertheless, the thrust of Hick’s objection is clear — it is illicit and precritical to speak, as the OA does, of existence ‘in the mind’.
+4 more sources
1989
Hick’s project is to find a way, of understanding the several religious traditions so that their respective claims will not be in conflict. The ideal would be that believers in one tradition who understand themselves in the way he proposes could accept believers in other traditions as having equal, or at least comparable, claims to truth and validity ...
+4 more sources
Hick’s project is to find a way, of understanding the several religious traditions so that their respective claims will not be in conflict. The ideal would be that believers in one tradition who understand themselves in the way he proposes could accept believers in other traditions as having equal, or at least comparable, claims to truth and validity ...
+4 more sources