Results 1 to 10 of about 3,835,713 (354)

Relationship between journal impact factor and the thoroughness and helpfulness of peer reviews. [PDF]

open access: yesPLoS Biology, 2023
The Journal Impact Factor is often used as a proxy measure for journal quality, but the empirical evidence is scarce. In particular, it is unclear how peer review characteristics for a journal relate to its impact factor.
Anna Severin   +6 more
doaj   +3 more sources

The Journal Impact Factor Should Not Be Discarded. [PDF]

open access: yesJ Korean Med Sci, 2017
The Journal Impact Factor (JIF) has been heavily criticized over decades. This opinion piece argues that the JIF should not be demonized. It still can be employed for research evaluation purposes by carefully considering the context and academic ...
Bornmann L, Pudovkin AI.
europepmc   +6 more sources

How COVID-19 Affected the Journal Impact Factor of High Impact Medical Journals: Bibliometric Analysis.

open access: yesJ Med Internet Res, 2022
Background Journal impact factor (IF) is the leading method of scholarly assessment in today’s research world, influencing where scholars submit their research and where funders distribute their resources. COVID-19, one of the most serious health crises,
Delardas O, Giannos P.
europepmc   +2 more sources

Building Journal Impact Factor Quartile into the Assessment of Academic Performance: A Case Study [PDF]

open access: yesParticipatory Educational Research, 7(2), 1-13 (2020), 2020
This study aims to provide information about the Q Concept defined as the division of journal impact factors into quartiles based on given field categories so that the disadvantages resulting from the direct use of journal impact factors can be eliminated.
Keziban Orbay, Ruben Miranda, M. Orbay
arxiv   +2 more sources

Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations. [PDF]

open access: yesElife, 2019
We analyzed how often and in what ways the Journal Impact Factor (JIF) is currently used in review, promotion, and tenure (RPT) documents of a representative sample of universities from the United States and Canada. 40% of research-intensive institutions
McKiernan EC   +5 more
europepmc   +2 more sources

Corruption of Journal Impact Factors [PDF]

open access: bronzeTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 2006
Requiring authors to cite articles from the same journal in which they hope to publish is a practice that the Editors of all Trends journals disapprove of. Beyond pointing authors in the direction of papers that they might have missed and would improve the quality of their articles, we do not require authors to cite articles from our journals.
Anurag A. Agrawal
openalex   +5 more sources

Use of the journal impact factor for assessing individual articles: Statistically flawed or not? [PDF]

open access: yesF1000Res, 2020
Most scientometricians reject the use of the journal impact factor for assessing individual articles and their authors. The well-known San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment also strongly objects against this way of using the impact factor ...
Waltman L, Traag VA.
europepmc   +2 more sources

Differences and similarities between Journal Impact Factor and CiteScore. [PDF]

open access: yesPharm Pract (Granada), 2018
Two major journal-based metrics are in competition: the Journal Impact Factor and CiteScore. Although these two metrics are based on similar principles of measuring the impact by citations, some differences between them exist. Years used to calculate the
Fernandez-Llimos F.
europepmc   +2 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy