Results 51 to 60 of about 5,879,935 (279)
High impact factors are meant to represent strong citation rates, but these journal impact factors are more effective at predicting a paper’s retraction rate [PDF]
Journal ranking schemes may seem useful, but Björn Brembs discusses how the Thompson Reuters Impact Factor appears to be a reliable predictor of the number of retractions, rather than citations a given paper will receive.
Brembs, Björn
core
Learning and Development Through the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
ABSTRACT This article focuses on learning that can facilitate the transition from being a scholarly teacher to becoming a scholar of teaching and learning, outlining the critical steps faculty can take to deepen their engagement with the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL).
Jennifer Friberg, Melanie Hamilton
wiley +1 more source
Sometimes the impact factor outshines the H index [PDF]
Journal impact factor (which reflects a particular journal's quality) and H index (which reflects the number and quality of an author's publications) are two measures of research quality.
Honekopp, Johannes, Kleber, Janet
core +4 more sources
ABSTRACT Background Bladder dysfunction affects over 85% of people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), yet current assessment methods are limited to periodic in‐clinic evaluations or subjective patient reports, failing to capture real‐world symptom fluctuations.
Valerie J. Block+8 more
wiley +1 more source
The article presents the problem of designing virtual courses for combined learning in the unified baccalaureate ofEcuador. Subsequently, an analysis of the considerations about this problem is made from defining the blearning as anorganizational form ...
WALFREDO GONZÁLEZ HERNÁNDEZ+1 more
doaj +1 more source
Real‐World Comparison of High‐Efficacy Versus Non‐High‐Efficacy Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis
ABSTRACT Objective The choice of the first disease modifying treatment (DMT) in multiple sclerosis (MS) is a topic of great interest, and whether high‐efficacy DMTs should be the first choice remains debated. We compared treatment outcomes (no evidence of disease activity [NEDA] and its components) between treatment‐naïve relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS ...
Sarmad Al‐Araji+9 more
wiley +1 more source
What do Experts Know About Ranking Journal Quality? A Comparison with ISI Research Impact in Finance [PDF]
Experts possess knowledge and information that are not publicly available. The paper is concerned with the ranking of academic journal quality and research impact using a survey of experts from a national project on ranking academic finance journals.
Chang, C-L., McAleer, M.J.
core +4 more sources
We offer a set of general recommendations addressed to Engineering and Applied Sciences students with the purpose ofimproving their preparation while managing the challenge of communicating science to their peers, general public andthe decision makers ...
MARCO LUIS SALCEDO TOVAR+1 more
doaj +1 more source
The Road Not Taken: Misclassifying an Anti‐Seizure Medication as a Failure
ABSTRACT Objective To quantify how often anti‐seizure medications (ASMs) appear ineffective yet provide benefit when considering seizure frequency (SF) variability. Methods We used the CHOCOLATES seizure diary simulator to generate 100,000 patient seizure diaries that reflect natural SF variation in a heterogeneous population.
Christopher N. Henry+1 more
wiley +1 more source
ABSTRACT Purpose This study aimed to explore the association between quantitative shape irregularity and density heterogeneity of hematomas and hematoma expansion (HE) for intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) patients. Methods This cohort study included patients arriving within 24 h of symptom onset between August 2021 and July 2022 as the derivation cohort ...
Zeqiang Ji+11 more
wiley +1 more source