Results 11 to 20 of about 72,036 (264)
Journal rankings and publication strategy [PDF]
AbstractWe study the impact of journal ranking systems on publication outlet choice. We investigate the publication behavior of UK-based scholars registered on IDEAS/RePEc and analyze the publication outcomes of their academic work uploaded to the repository.
Piotr Spiewanowski, Oleksandr Talavera
openaire +1 more source
Neophilia ranking of scientific journals [PDF]
The ranking of scientific journals is important because of the signal it sends to scientists about what is considered most vital for scientific progress. Existing ranking systems focus on measuring the influence of a scientific paper (citations)-these rankings do not reward journals for publishing innovative work that builds on new ideas. We propose an
Mikko Packalen, Jay Bhattacharya
openaire +3 more sources
Uncertainty and the ranking of economics journals [PDF]
AbstractJournal rankings often show significant changes compared to previous rankings. This gives rise to the question of how well estimated the rank of a journal is. In this contribution, we consider uncertainty in a ranking of economics journals. We use the invariant method of Pinski and Narin to rank the journals.
Johan Lyhagen, Per Ahlgren
openaire +3 more sources
A Journal Ranking for the Ambitious Economist [PDF]
The authors devise an “ambition-adjusted” journal ranking based on citations from a short list of top general-interest journals in economics. Underlying this ranking is the notion that an ambitious economist wishes to be acknowledged not only in the highest reaches of t he profession, but also outside his or her subfield.
Kristie M. Engemann, Howard J. Wall
openaire +1 more source
Sleep researchers’ rankings of sleep journals
SummaryThe impact factor is used to rank the quality of scientific journals but has been criticised for a number of reasons. The aim of the study was to investigate sleep researchers’ perceptions of sleep journals to determine whether subjective rankings of journals were in line with the journals’ impact factors.
Siri Jakobsson Støre +2 more
openaire +3 more sources
Ranking philosophy journals: a meta-ranking and a new survey ranking
AbstractThis paper presents a meta-ranking of philosophy journals based on existing rankings, and a new ranking of philosophy journals developed through a survey involving a thousand authors (351 respondents, data collection May 2022) of articles from the most recent issues of 40 general philosophy journals.
openaire +1 more source
Journal rankings and the ABS Journal Quality Guide [PDF]
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to provide an outline of the arguments for and against different types of journal ranking lists, and, against this background, an account of the development of the Association of Business Schools' (ABS) Journal Quality Guide.Design/methodology/approachThe paper identifies recent trends in academic journal publication
Morris H, Harvey C, Kelly A
openaire +4 more sources
Ranking journals: could Google Scholar Metrics be an alternative to Journal Citation Reports and Scimago Journal Rank? [PDF]
ABSTRACTThe launch of Google Scholar Metrics as a tool for assessing scientific journals may be serious competition for Thomson Reuters' Journal Citation Reports, and for the Scopus‐powered Scimago Journal Rank. A review of these bibliometric journal evaluation products is performed.
Emilio Delgado López-Cózar +1 more
openaire +4 more sources
University rankings: Time to reconsider [PDF]
University rankings offer some benefits but also come with significant drawbacks. While they can encourage healthy competition, they often lead to unethical practices and prioritize short- term gains over long-term educational purposes. Relying on biased
Khaled Moustafa
doaj +1 more source
The scientometric indices, such as the journal Impact Factor (IF) or SCImago Journal Rank (SJR), often play a determining role while choosing a journal for possible publication.
Salim Sazzed
doaj +1 more source

