Results 61 to 70 of about 137,035 (215)
Solo music performance assessment criteria: a systematic review
Assessment is a crucial aspect of music performance. In pedagogical contexts, an effective assessment process can measure student achievement and inform instructional decisions that contribute to improving teaching and learning.
Nádia Moura +9 more
doaj +1 more source
Should Judges Worry About the "CSI Effect"?
These days it still seems like everyone is talking about the "CSI effect." Attorneys seem to talk about it all the time. The 258 different articles using the term between 2002 and 2008 that we found through a LexisNexis search are undoubtedly only the ...
A. Cole, Simon, Dioso-Villa, Rachel
core
Judicial Collegiality and Tolerance of Difference: Insights from Justice Johan Froneman's Dissents
The retirement of Justice Johan Froneman from the Constitutional Court of South Africa provides an ideal opportunity to reflect on his approach to collegiality and tolerance of difference.
Felix Dube
doaj +1 more source
Power Distance between Judges and Witnesses and Judicial Innovations
The aim of the paper is to outline a new original approach to judicial innovations, in comparison to the previous conceptualizations or actual innovation agendas.
Michał Dudek, Mateusz Stępień
doaj +1 more source
Attacking Judges How Campaign Advertising Influences State Supreme Court Elections
Nasty, below-the-belt campaigns, mudslinging, and character attacks. These tactics have become part and parcel of today's election politics in America, and judicial elections are no exception.
Hall, Melinda
core
The Empirical Case for Judicial review: Judges as Agents and Judges as Trustees
Lawyers, constitutional theorists and political philosophers continue to disagree over the merits and legitimacy of judicial review. Borrowing insights from delegation theory, industrial organization as well as empirical accounts of judicial behaviour ...
Dyevre, Arthur
core
Do judges enhance home advantage in European championship boxing? [PDF]
There have been many examples of contentious points decisions in boxing. Professional boxing is scored subjectively by judges and referees scoring each round of the contest. We assessed whether the probability of a home win (and therefore home advantage)
Balmer, Nigel J. +2 more
core
Contains fulltext : 119088.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)
Adams, M. +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
uncover during deliberations as well as relevant information from previous decisions. I assume that judges have reputation concerns and try to signal to an evaluator that they can interpret the law correctly.
Levy, Gilat
core
RUSSIAN JUDGES AND HIGHER LEGAL EDUCATION: HISTORICAL ASPECT
The article is devoted to the history of the formation in the Russian legislation of thequalification requirement for judges to have the higher legal education. The analysis of the normative acts is carried out in conjunction with the brief consideration
Dmitry O. Serov
doaj

