Results 251 to 260 of about 652,138 (307)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1997
Experiments have shown that, generally, people are overconfident about the correctness of their answers to questions. Cognitive psychologists have attributed this to biases in the way people generate and handle evidence for and against their views. The overconfidence phenomenon and cognitive psychologists' accounts of its origins have recently given ...
openaire +2 more sources
Experiments have shown that, generally, people are overconfident about the correctness of their answers to questions. Cognitive psychologists have attributed this to biases in the way people generate and handle evidence for and against their views. The overconfidence phenomenon and cognitive psychologists' accounts of its origins have recently given ...
openaire +2 more sources
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2008
There are many contexts in which people make judgments about prior judgments. For example, Internet shopping bots (e.g., NexTag.com) allow consumers to search for products and, if the price is too high, list a price at which they would consider making the purchase (i.e., base judgment).
Chris, Janiszewski +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
There are many contexts in which people make judgments about prior judgments. For example, Internet shopping bots (e.g., NexTag.com) allow consumers to search for products and, if the price is too high, list a price at which they would consider making the purchase (i.e., base judgment).
Chris, Janiszewski +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
General Hospital Psychiatry, 1988
There is currently no satisfactory way to assess judgment and yet the clinician is frequently confronted with this responsibility. The author reviews the judgment and decision-making literature, proposes a model for testing judgment, applies this model to patients in a medical setting, and makes the model operational for empirical study.
openaire +2 more sources
There is currently no satisfactory way to assess judgment and yet the clinician is frequently confronted with this responsibility. The author reviews the judgment and decision-making literature, proposes a model for testing judgment, applies this model to patients in a medical setting, and makes the model operational for empirical study.
openaire +2 more sources
From The Judgment to Judgmental Identity
1976The predicability of truth and falsity defines for Aristotle the type of discourse of concern to the logician. Indeed, discourse of any type is constituted by sentences understood as unities of meaning. And although a sentence must have a meaning in order to be a sentence at all, only those which can be declared true or false form the area of ...
openaire +1 more source
2011
La théorie de l'agrégation des jugements généralise celle du choix social en faisant porter la règle d'agrégation sur des jugements quelconques au lieu des seuls jugements de préférence. L'article en fait brièvement la synthèse en privilégiant la variante qui formalise le jugement par une syntaxe logique.
openaire +2 more sources
La théorie de l'agrégation des jugements généralise celle du choix social en faisant porter la règle d'agrégation sur des jugements quelconques au lieu des seuls jugements de préférence. L'article en fait brièvement la synthèse en privilégiant la variante qui formalise le jugement par une syntaxe logique.
openaire +2 more sources
Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2023
Scott Highhouse, Margaret E Brooks
exaly
Scott Highhouse, Margaret E Brooks
exaly
A Review on the Accuracy of Teacher Judgments
Educational Research Review, 2021Lisette Wijnia, Detlef Urhahne
exaly