Results 251 to 260 of about 224,410 (309)
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2011 La théorie de l'agrégation des jugements généralise celle du choix social en faisant porter la règle d'agrégation sur des jugements quelconques au lieu des seuls jugements de préférence. L'article en fait brièvement la synthèse en privilégiant la variante qui formalise le jugement par une syntaxe logique.
openaire +4 more sources
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Science and Engineering Ethics, 2011
Judgment is central to engineering, medicine, the sciences and many other practical activities. For example, one who otherwise knows what engineers know but lacks "engineering judgment" may be an expert of sorts, a handy resource much like a reference book or database, but cannot be a competent engineer.
openaire +2 more sources
Judgment is central to engineering, medicine, the sciences and many other practical activities. For example, one who otherwise knows what engineers know but lacks "engineering judgment" may be an expert of sorts, a handy resource much like a reference book or database, but cannot be a competent engineer.
openaire +2 more sources
Current Surgery, 2003
When is it appropriate for physicians to incorporate their personal or political values in the treatment of a patient? How do physicians take action against prejudice without jeopardizing the relationship of trust that is the foundation of patient care?
openaire +2 more sources
When is it appropriate for physicians to incorporate their personal or political values in the treatment of a patient? How do physicians take action against prejudice without jeopardizing the relationship of trust that is the foundation of patient care?
openaire +2 more sources
Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1997
Experiments have shown that, generally, people are overconfident about the correctness of their answers to questions. Cognitive psychologists have attributed this to biases in the way people generate and handle evidence for and against their views. The overconfidence phenomenon and cognitive psychologists' accounts of its origins have recently given ...
openaire +2 more sources
Experiments have shown that, generally, people are overconfident about the correctness of their answers to questions. Cognitive psychologists have attributed this to biases in the way people generate and handle evidence for and against their views. The overconfidence phenomenon and cognitive psychologists' accounts of its origins have recently given ...
openaire +2 more sources
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2008
There are many contexts in which people make judgments about prior judgments. For example, Internet shopping bots (e.g., NexTag.com) allow consumers to search for products and, if the price is too high, list a price at which they would consider making the purchase (i.e., base judgment).
Chris, Janiszewski +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
There are many contexts in which people make judgments about prior judgments. For example, Internet shopping bots (e.g., NexTag.com) allow consumers to search for products and, if the price is too high, list a price at which they would consider making the purchase (i.e., base judgment).
Chris, Janiszewski +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Summary Judgments/Declaratory Judgments
2011Abstract This chapter evaluates summary judgments and declaratory judgments. In some patent cases, an application for summary judgment may cause the issues in dispute to be narrowed, or it may assist a litigant to have one or more parts of the case removed.
openaire +1 more source
General Hospital Psychiatry, 1988
There is currently no satisfactory way to assess judgment and yet the clinician is frequently confronted with this responsibility. The author reviews the judgment and decision-making literature, proposes a model for testing judgment, applies this model to patients in a medical setting, and makes the model operational for empirical study.
openaire +2 more sources
There is currently no satisfactory way to assess judgment and yet the clinician is frequently confronted with this responsibility. The author reviews the judgment and decision-making literature, proposes a model for testing judgment, applies this model to patients in a medical setting, and makes the model operational for empirical study.
openaire +2 more sources
From The Judgment to Judgmental Identity
1976The predicability of truth and falsity defines for Aristotle the type of discourse of concern to the logician. Indeed, discourse of any type is constituted by sentences understood as unities of meaning. And although a sentence must have a meaning in order to be a sentence at all, only those which can be declared true or false form the area of ...
openaire +1 more source