Results 51 to 60 of about 327,254 (208)
“Encroachments and Oppressions”: The Corporatization of Procedure and the Decline of Rule of Law [PDF]
, 2018 This Article begins by providing a brief account of the corporatization of procedure through judicial decision-making and noting some of the detrimental effects it has had on the preservation of rule of law and access to justice.
Glover, J. Maria
core +2 more sources
Due Process Land Use Claims After Lingle [PDF]
, 2007 The Supreme Court held in Lingle v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. that challenges to the validity of land use regulations for failing to advance governmental interests must be brought under the Due Process Clause, rather than the Takings Clause, and must be ...
Byrne, J. Peter
core +1 more source
Historical legal aspects of judicial discretion [PDF]
, 2015 Стаття присвячена судовому розсуду як можливості суддів ухвалити рішення в кожному конкретному випадку, залежно від конкретних фактів і обставин. Судовий розсуд розглядається в історико-правовому аспекті, від часів Стародавнього Єгипту і Стародавнього ...
Kravchuk, Mykola A. +1 more
core
Judicial Discretion and Sentencing Behavior [PDF]
This research studies the impact of changes to federal judicial discretion on criminal sentencing outcomes. The Feeney Amendment to the 2003 PROTECT Act restricted federal judges’ ability to impose sentences outside of the U.S.
Freeborn, Beth, Hartmann, Monica
core +1 more source
Dead Again: The Latest Demise of the Confrontation Clause [PDF]
, 2011 In Crawford v. Washington, the Supreme Court abandoned its Roberts “reliability” approach to the right of confrontation. The Court conceded that the Roberts decision had killed the Confrontation Clause by: (1) impermissibly tying the right of ...
Cicchini, Michael D.
core +1 more source
Judge or Bureaucrat? How Administrative Law Judges Exercise Discretion in Welfare Bureaucracies [PDF]
, 2012 Administrative law judges are neglected but powerful actors in public welfare bureaucracies, presiding over quasi-judicial hearings triggered if participants challenge a bureaucratic decision on public welfare benefits.
Lens, Vicki A.
core +2 more sources
Judicial Discretion in Sentencing
Federal Sentencing Reporter, 1991 The role of judicial discretion in the sentencing process is a fundamental and inescapable issue. It tends to become obscured by other issues, such as determinancy and penal policies. When it does come to the public's attention, it is usually in a context of controversy over what a judge has done.
openaire +3 more sources
The Anatomy of Discretion: An Analysis of Prosecutorial Decision Making [PDF]
, 2012 Prosecuting attorneys enjoy exceptionally broad discretion in making decisions that influence criminal case outcomes. They make pivotal decisions throughout the life of a case with little public or judicial scrutiny.
Bruce Frederick, Don Stemen
core