Results 1 to 10 of about 1,147,578 (295)
Int J Syst Evol MicrobiolOpinion 132 deals with a Request for an Opinion asking the Judicial Commission to assess the nomenclatural status of Skermania piniformis (Blackall et al. 1989) Chun et al.
Arahal DR +11 more
europepmc +6 more sources
Int J Syst Evol MicrobiolOpinion 130 deals with a Request for an Opinion asking the Judicial Commission to clarify whether the genus name Rhodococcus Zopf 1891 (Approved Lists 1980) is illegitimate. The Request is approved and an answer is given. The name Rhodococcus Zopf 1891 (Approved Lists 1980) is illegitimate because it is a later homonym of the validly published ...
Arahal DR +11 more
europepmc +11 more sources
Int J Syst Evol MicrobiolOpinion 131 addresses a Request for an Opinion asking the Judicial Commission to conserve the genus name Proteus Hauser 1885 (Approved Lists 1980) over its earlier homonym, the protozoan genus name Proteus Müller 1786. The Judicial Commission agrees that the later homonym is illegitimate and that the replacement of the prokaryotic name Proteus would be
Arahal DR +10 more
europepmc +5 more sources
Judicial Opinions 133 and 134. [PDF]
Int J Syst Evol MicrobiolOpinion 133 addresses the unusual situation of two genus names that are homonyms and are also considered heterotypic synonyms. Furthermore, it clarifies the meaning of the term ‘homonym’ in the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes, as well as the implications of the absence of the term ‘isonym’ from that code.
Arahal DR +12 more
europepmc +4 more sources
Agricultural biotechnology in the courts: judicial opinions and commentary. [PDF]
Front Bioeng BiotechnolSeven jurisdictions from around the world have issued judicial opinions that address fundamental issues about the governance and regulatory systems of agricultural biotechnology. This article summarizes these legal proceedings and describes their impact upon agricultural biotechnology.
Kershen DL.
europepmc +4 more sources
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 2023 Judicial Opinion 128 addresses nomenclatural issues related to the names of classes validly published under the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. It is confirmed that the common ending -proteobacteria of some class names is not indicative of a joint taxonomic or phylogenetic placement; that the nomenclatural type of
Arahal, David +10 more
openaire +9 more sources
Judicial expert opinion as a speech genre (based on judicial medical expertise) [PDF]
Жанры речи, 2021 The article describes the model of the genre of “judicial expert opinion” and considers a medical expert opinion as its example. A judicial expert opinion is defined as a written text including the research and conclusions on the issues posed to the ...
Vladimirova , Sofya Borisovna
doaj +1 more source
Fides et Ratio, 2022 Divorce cases where divorcing spouses have minor children pose a particular challenge for psychologists and lawyers. The court decides on important matters regarding the child and the family, but formally does not have sufficient knowledge of the ...
Agnieszka Pisarska
doaj +1 more source
Article 47 of the Charter in the Opinion Procedure: Some Reflections Following Opinion 1/17
European Papers, 2021 (Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2021 6(1), 741-755 | Article | (Table of Contents) I. Introduction. - II. Questioning art. 47's role in the Opinion procedure. - II.1. Art. 47's specific scope of application.
Eleftheria Neframi
doaj +1 more source
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 2022 Opinion 112 denies the request to place Seliberia Aristovskaya and Parinkina 1963 (Approved Lists 1980) on the list of rejected names because the information provided is insufficient. For the same reason, Opinion 113 denies the request to reject
Arahal, David +11 more
openaire +5 more sources