Results 21 to 30 of about 16,853 (243)
Attitudes toward the Use of Force: Instrumental Imperatives, Moral Principles, and International Law
American Journal of Political Science, Volume 65, Issue 3, Page 612-633, July 2021., 2021 Abstract What informs ordinary citizens' attitudes toward the use of force? Previous research identifies several key concerns in public opinion toward war, but does not directly evaluate the relative importance of these considerations. We articulate three distinct logics of war support—moral, legal, and instrumental—and use an experimental survey with ...
Janina Dill, Livia I. Schubiger
wiley +1 more source
Enforcement of Jus Ad Bellum: From Mukden and Ethiopia to Ukraine
Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 2023 Jus Ad Bellum, the international law on using force, is a critical component of maintaining world peace. We compared the effectiveness of regulating and preventing conflict in the modern era by analyzing three cases: the Mukden Incident, the Second Italo-
Zhiyuan Du
semanticscholar +1 more source
The Jus ad Bellum and Russia’s “Special Military Operation” in Ukraine
Journal of International Peacekeeping, 2022 This editorial commentary examines the justifications put forward by the Russian government for its “special military operation” against the background of the law governing the use of force (jus ad bellum).
T. D. Gill
semanticscholar +1 more source
The targeted killing of Qasem Soleimani: A case study through the lens of jus ad bellum
Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies, 2022 At dawn on 3 January 2020 local time, the United States targeted and killed Iranian General Qasem Soleimani, which it claimed was an exercise of its right to self-defense.
B. K. Kelemen, M. Kiss
semanticscholar +1 more source
, 2023 Philosophy &Public Affairs, Volume 51, Issue 1, Page 33-59, Winter 2023.
David J. Clark
wiley +1 more source
New dilemmas of the «just war» theory
RUDN Journal of Political Science, 2023 Referring to the classical tenets of the “just war” theory, the author also analyses its modern versions. While the research the author arrives at the conclusion that some political scientists have modernized the theory of “a just war” according to the ...
Ekaterina P. Shanchenko
doaj +1 more source
Challenges of Compliance with the Distinction and Proportionality Principles Regarding the Global Nuclear Deterrence Policies [PDF]
Analele Universităţii din Oradea. Relaţii Internaţionale şi Studii Europene, 2023 The article advocates for a multidisciplinary approach to the challenges surrounding nuclear weapons and the implementation of the proportion and distinction IHL principles. It also examines the relationship between nuclear deterrence policies and IHL
Claudiu Denis CHIȘEREU
doaj +1 more source
Mixing oil and water? The interaction between jus ad bellum and jus in bello during armed conflicts
Journal on the Use of Force and International Law, 2022 This article assesses the applicability of jus ad bellum rules during armed conflicts. It first presents the overlap between the jus ad bellum and jus in bello with respect to the use of armed interstate force, then rejects the ‘displacement’ approach ...
G. Cohen
semanticscholar +1 more source
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law), 2022 Classical international law recognizes a rigid, autonomous, and independent dichotomy between jus ad bellum and jus in bello, which can result in the possibility of a just war being carried out illegally or vice versa.
S. Sefriani
semanticscholar +1 more source
Actor-pluralism, the ‘turn to responsibility’ and the jus ad bellum: ‘Unwilling or unable’ in context [PDF]
, 2015 With the increasing (although by no means uniquely modern) phenomenon of un-attributable NSA cross-border violence, a purely inter-state-rights based approach to Article 51 of the UN Charter is not (if ever indeed it was) sustainable.
Trapp, KN
core +1 more source