Results 91 to 100 of about 464 (133)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Demonstration of Kathon® CG in some commercial products

Contact Dermatitis, 1986
The preservative Kathon® CG has become one of the most common sensitizers It has. however, been difficult 10 explain the sensitization and to assess the clinical relevance of the contact allergy, partly due to lack of specification of the preservative m products. A high‐performance liquid chromatography method was used to demonstrate Kathon® CO in 12.1
Magnus Bruze   +2 more
exaly   +3 more sources

Frequency of sensitisation to the preservative Kathon® CG

Contact Dermatitis, 1988
The incidences of sensitisation to Kathon® CG are reported for patients routinely tested from 1984 to 1986 in Bari. London. Louvain, Nijmegen, Oulu and San Francisco, For these 3 years, the overall frequency of sensitisation varied for women from 3.3% in Oulu to 0.6% in London and San Francisco and for men from 1.4% in Oulu to 0% in San Francisco ...
Howard Maibach   +2 more
exaly   +3 more sources

Sensitization to Kathon CG in Geneva and Switzerland

Contact Dermatitis, 1989
Between October 1986 and June 1987 we patch tested 420 patients with Kathon CG at 100 ppm and obtained 23 positive reactions (5.5%). The other 5 Swiss university clinics joined our study between January and June 1987 and obtained sensitization rates ranging from 0.7 to 7.5%. The total mean value including Geneva was 3.6%. We did threshold patch testing
Pasche F, Hunziker N
exaly   +4 more sources

Contact allergy to the active ingredients of Kathon® CG

Contact Dermatitis, 1987
The preservative Kathon1 CG is a commercial preparation, consisting of 2 active ingredients and other components. 28 patients with contact allergy to Kathon CG participated in a study in which patch testing was performed with serial dilutions, and with 5 chromatographically separated fractions.
Magnus Bruze   +2 more
exaly   +3 more sources

Diagnostic patch test concentration for Kathon CG

Contact Dermatitis, 1985
Patch test studies. 21‐day cumulative irrtancy assays and Draize repeat insult patch tests with Kathon CG, were used to ascertain; in appropriate diagnostic patch test concentration. A dilution of 100 ppm a.i. (aq. or pet.) appears to have low irritancy potential.
Howard Maibach
exaly   +3 more sources

Measurement of risk of sensitisation and its application to Kathon

Contact Dermatitis, 1987
The prevalences of patch test reactions to 27 common allergens including Kathon 100ppm, were calculated in a standard test battery applied to 2 consecutive cohorts of 656 and 653 patients seen in 1985/6 and 1986/7. The overall prevalence of Kathon Sensitivity was 0.9% for 1985–87.
S, Shuster, J, Spiro
openaire   +2 more sources

Sensitivity to Kathon CG: findings in 365 consecutive patients

Contact Dermatitis, 1988
In the period from 1983 through 1986, 365 consecutive patients suspected as having allergic contact dermatitis were tested for reaction to Kathon CG. This test was positive in 20 of these patients irritant responses in 7 and allergic sensitivity in 13. Provocative use testing was positive in 1 of the 3 allergic patients tested.
Anthony F Fransway
exaly   +3 more sources

Routine patch testing with the preservative system Kathon CG

International Journal of Cosmetic Science, 1988
SynopsisOf 1620 patients routinely patch tested with Kathon CG 100 p.p.m. aqua for suspected allergic contact dermatitis, 81 (5.0%) had a positive reaction. Sixty‐two reactions (3.8%) were relevant for the dermatitis for which the patient consulted the dermatologist.
A C, Groot   +3 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Kathon CG

Contact Dermatitis, 1987
A C, de Groot, D P, Bruynzeel
openaire   +2 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy