Results 151 to 160 of about 4,939 (209)
Lawrence Kohlberg consensus and controversy ; [essays in honour of Lawrence Kohlberg]
, 1986 Kohlberg, Lawrence 1927-1987 +1 more
core
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Theory and Psychology, 2001
In this contribution we propose a comparative reconstruction of Kohlberg's and Freud's theories of moral development. We concentrate not on the developmental processes and their driving forces, but on the emerging conceptions of morality according to both theories.
Agnes Tellings, Wouter Van Haaften
exaly +3 more sources
In this contribution we propose a comparative reconstruction of Kohlberg's and Freud's theories of moral development. We concentrate not on the developmental processes and their driving forces, but on the emerging conceptions of morality according to both theories.
Agnes Tellings, Wouter Van Haaften
exaly +3 more sources
2019
Abstract Given this cognitive-developmental concern with superficiality-to-depth in moral judgment or understanding, Kohlberg was particularly concerned to discover and articulate an age trend and possible sequence of developmental advances or stages that may be universal.
John C Gibbs, Gibbs John C
exaly +2 more sources
Abstract Given this cognitive-developmental concern with superficiality-to-depth in moral judgment or understanding, Kohlberg was particularly concerned to discover and articulate an age trend and possible sequence of developmental advances or stages that may be universal.
John C Gibbs, Gibbs John C
exaly +2 more sources
AFFECTIVITY IN KOHLBERG AND FOWLER
Religious Education, 1981(1981). AFFECTIVITY IN KOHLBERG AND FOWLER. Religious Education: Vol. 76, No. 1, pp. 33-48.
openaire +1 more source
Kohlberg and Moral Development
Journal of Moral Education, 1972(1972). Kohlberg and Moral Development. Journal of Moral Education: Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 123-128.
openaire +1 more source
An Interdisciplinary Treatment of Kohlberg
Ethics, 1982Philosophical critiques of Kohlberg's theory share the call to "get serious" about how philosophical claims are made in psychology. They show impatience with Kohlberg's lack of rigor in making conceptual distinctions and characterizing normative views.
openaire +1 more source