Results 231 to 240 of about 280,629 (279)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
COHERENCE, EVIDENCE, AND LEGAL PROOF
Legal Theory, 2013The aim of this essay is to develop a coherence theory for the justification of evidentiary judgments in law. The main claim of the coherence theory proposed in this article is that a belief about the events being litigated is justified if and only if it is a belief that an epistemically responsible fact finder might hold by virtue of its coherence in ...
Amalia Amaya
openaire +2 more sources
The Reasonable and the Relevant: Legal Standards of Proof
Philosophy and Public Affairs, 2019 According to a common conception of legal proof, satisfying a legal burden requires establishing a claim to a numerical threshold. Beyond reasonable doubt, for example, is often glossed as 90% or 95% likelihood given the evidence.
Georgi Gardiner
exaly +3 more sources
Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 1989
Nancy J. Dunham, Robert L. Birmingham
openaire +2 more sources
Nancy J. Dunham, Robert L. Birmingham
openaire +2 more sources
2022
Abstract Existing discussions of legal proof address a host of apparently disparate questions: What does it take to prove a fact beyond a reasonable doubt? Why is the reasonable doubt standard notoriously elusive, sometimes considered by courts to be impossible to define?
Sarah Moss, Moss Sarah
exaly +2 more sources
Abstract Existing discussions of legal proof address a host of apparently disparate questions: What does it take to prove a fact beyond a reasonable doubt? Why is the reasonable doubt standard notoriously elusive, sometimes considered by courts to be impossible to define?
Sarah Moss, Moss Sarah
exaly +2 more sources
Fact Investigation and Proof Standards in Legal Argumentation
IEEE Intelligent Systems, 2021A logical framework is presented to model legal interpretation and bring an appropriate construction of legal arguments. Reasoning with assumptions allows the construction of hypotheses. This is proposed in the context of legal procedures’ dynamics, where the framework evolves as part of the investigation prior to each trial instance. Two gender-biased
Martin O Moguillansky
exaly +3 more sources
Content Analysis Software in Legal Research: A Proof of Concept Using ATLAS.ti
Tilburg Law Review, 2018 This paper highlights the opportunities of utilizing software programs that allow qualitative analysis. By using software supported content analysis in legal research, we argue that research findings can become more scientifically robust (for instance ...
Hanna Schebesta
exaly +2 more sources
Proof in law: Legal language and legal institutions
International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 1989Jerzy Wroblewski
exaly +2 more sources
Burden of proof in legal argumentation
Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Artificial intelligence and law - ICAIL '95, 1995We present a computational model of dialectical argumentation that could serve as a basis for studying elements of legal reasoning. Argumentation is well-suited to decisionmaking in the legal domain, where knowledge is incomplete, uncertain, and inconsistent, We model an argument both as information structure, i.e., argument units connecting claims ...
Arthur M. Farley, Kathleen Freeman
openaire +1 more source
Logic Programming and Burden of Proof in Legal Reasoning
New Generation Computing, 2012zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
Ken Satoh, Satoh Ken
exaly +2 more sources