Results 251 to 260 of about 1,216,368 (302)
Diagnosing death, best interests, consent and the law. [PDF]
J Intensive Care SocScott L.
europepmc +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
2022
Abstract Existing discussions of legal proof address a host of apparently disparate questions: What does it take to prove a fact beyond a reasonable doubt? Why is the reasonable doubt standard notoriously elusive, sometimes considered by courts to be impossible to define?
openaire +3 more sources
Abstract Existing discussions of legal proof address a host of apparently disparate questions: What does it take to prove a fact beyond a reasonable doubt? Why is the reasonable doubt standard notoriously elusive, sometimes considered by courts to be impossible to define?
openaire +3 more sources
Philosophical Issues, 2021
When facts are proven within the formal process of legal proof, in virtue of what are they proven? This deceptively simple question is both a matter of enormous practical importance and a matter of intense, ongoing dispute within evidence scholarship.
openaire +1 more source
When facts are proven within the formal process of legal proof, in virtue of what are they proven? This deceptively simple question is both a matter of enormous practical importance and a matter of intense, ongoing dispute within evidence scholarship.
openaire +1 more source
Journal of Education, 1935
Awarded Third Prize in the Journal of Education's Second Annual Short Story Contest
openaire +1 more source
Awarded Third Prize in the Journal of Education's Second Annual Short Story Contest
openaire +1 more source
Language modeling for legal proof
2010 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Knowledge Engineering, 2010In common law jurisdictions, the notion of proof beyond a reasonable doubt is frequently related to notions such as the belief or certainty of a judge or a juror about reality. The notion of balance of probabilities is however related to likelihood or probability.
null Le Cheng, null Winnie Cheng
openaire +1 more source
Legal Proof: Foundherentism and Statistical Evidence
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2021This paper is one of several papers initially presented at a conference in March 2020 at the University of Girona, in Spain, in honor of Susan Haack, which will be published after translation into Spanish by Marcel Pons. This paper discusses (i) Haack's important work on proving causation or any other alleged facts, which focuses on case law and ...
openaire +1 more source
Burden of proof in legal argumentation
Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Artificial intelligence and law - ICAIL '95, 1995We present a computational model of dialectical argumentation that could serve as a basis for studying elements of legal reasoning. Argumentation is well-suited to decisionmaking in the legal domain, where knowledge is incomplete, uncertain, and inconsistent, We model an argument both as information structure, i.e., argument units connecting claims ...
Arthur M. Farley, Kathleen Freeman
openaire +1 more source
COHERENCE, EVIDENCE, AND LEGAL PROOF
Legal Theory, 2013The aim of this essay is to develop a coherence theory for the justification of evidentiary judgments in law. The main claim of the coherence theory proposed in this article is that a belief about the events being litigated is justified if and only if it is a belief that an epistemically responsible fact finder might hold by virtue of its coherence in ...
openaire +1 more source