Results 261 to 270 of about 1,280,572 (291)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Length-Weight Relationships in Some Salmonid Fishes
The Progressive Fish-Culturist, 1975(1975). Length-Weight Relationships in Some Salmonid Fishes. The Progressive Fish-Culturist: Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 181-184.
Robert G. Piper +2 more
openaire +1 more source
Length weight Relationships Of Jamaican Arthropods
2000(Uploaded by Plazi from the Biodiversity Heritage Library) No abstract provided.
Johnson, M D, Strong, A M
openaire +1 more source
Length-weight relationship and growth of Labeo bata
Bangladesh Journal of Fisheries, 2023This study was executed to elucidate the length-weight relationship (LWR) yet the annual condition of the Labeo bata (Hamilton, 1822), an immensely important fishery of Bangladesh. Overall, 447 specimens employed during this study were collected by using traditional fishing gear (cast net).
ZANNATUL FERDOUSHI +5 more
openaire +1 more source
Length–Weight Relationship for Pomfret
Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 1972The length–weight relationship for 298 pomfret (Brama japonica) ranging in fork length from 30 to 49 cm, and caught in 1956 and 1957 in the Gulf of Alaska by gillnets varying in mesh size from [Formula: see text] (63 mm) to [Formula: see text] inches (133 mm) was examined.
openaire +1 more source
A Generalized Allometric Model for Determining Length‐Weight Relationship
Biometrical Journal, 1997AbstractWell‐known allometric model is critically reviewed for determining the length‐weight relationship. Procedure to be followed for applying this model under the assumption of multiplicative as well as additive error is discussed. The possibility of autocorrelations in error term is explored.
Venugopalan, R., Prajneshu
openaire +2 more sources
Length-weight relationship ofXenentodon cancila (Ham.) (Teleostei: Belonidae)
Proceedings: Animal Sciences, 1986The length-weight relationship ofXenentodon cancila (Ham.) was calculated for males and females. A total of 416 females and 141 males ranging from 101–230 mm in total length was used for the study. Results showed that there is a close relationship between the length and weight of fish.
B Chandrika, N K Balasubramonian
openaire +1 more source
Length–Weight Relationship of the White Croaker
Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 1964(1964). Length–Weight Relationship of the White Croaker. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society: Vol. 93, No. 3, pp. 302-303.
openaire +1 more source
Fecundity and Length–Weight Relationship in Lingcod
Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 1967not available
openaire +1 more source
Length-weight relationships of 33 fish species from New Zealand
Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 2015Summary Length–weight relationships are presented for 33 fish species from New Zealand. The parameters a and b of the equation W = aLb were estimated. Parameter b ranged from 2.51 (Pseudocaranx dentex) to 3.51 (Alepocephalus antipodianus) with a mean of 3.12 ± 0.24. Most of these estimates (90.9%) were between 2.8 and 3.4. Maximum lengths and depths
Crec 'Hriou, Romain +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
Length-weight relationships of some freshwater fishes of Iran
Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 2006Summary Length–weight relationships were estimated for 24 freshwater fish species of Iran. Significant length–weight relationships with high correlation coefficient were found for all species. The value of the parameter b varied between 2.881 and 3.545.
H. R. Esmaeili, M. Ebrahimi
openaire +1 more source