Results 61 to 70 of about 38,058 (238)
Logical fallacies in medical practice
Clinical reasoning as a method of problem-solving in routine medical practice is the basis of all decisions made by physicians to understand the disease and choose appropriate therapeutic tactics. The interaction between physicians and the exchange of opinions can often lead to disagreements about diagnostic and treatment priorities. The quality of the
openaire +1 more source
Abstract This study investigates whether prior exposure to natural disasters influenced individual compliance with non‐pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs), specifically lockdown measures, during the Corona Virus Infectious Disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic. Focusing on the Marche region of Italy, which experienced a severe earthquake in 2016, we exploit
Vincenzo Alfano +2 more
wiley +1 more source
Abstract Ecuador's 2008 Constitution advanced an ambitious substantive economic vision through Buen Vivir (Good Living), recognizing a plural economy which encompasses private, public and solidarity economy (SE) sectors. This paper aims to analyze public procurement programs in Ecuador, one of the flagship Buen Vivir policies for SE promotion.
Maria‐José Ruiz‐Rivera +1 more
wiley +1 more source
Rigorous Science: a How-To Guide
Proposals to improve the reproducibility of biomedical research have emphasized scientific rigor. Although the word “rigor” is widely used, there has been little specific discussion as to what it means and how it can be achieved.
Arturo Casadevall, Ferric C. Fang
doaj +1 more source
ABSTRACT This article challenges the claim that conscientious refusal and conscientious provision in healthcare are mutually exclusive and thus asymmetrical. While US law protects healthcare providers who refuse to perform medical services on moral or religious grounds, it offers no equivalent protections to those who feel morally compelled to provide ...
Tzofit Ofengenden
wiley +1 more source
Thoughts about a General Theory of Influence in a DIME/PMESII/ASCOP/IRC2 Model [PDF]
The leading question of this paper is: “How would influence warfare (“iWar”) work and how can we simulate it?” The paper discusses foundational aspects of a theory and model of influence warfare by discussing a framework built along the DIME/PMESII/ASCOP
Kodalle, Thorsten +3 more
core
Reasoning under uncertainty: the role of two informal fallacies in an emerging scientific inquiry [PDF]
It is now commonplace in fallacy inquiry for many of the traditional informal fallacies to be viewed as reasonable or non-fallacious modes of argument.
Cummings, L
core +1 more source
“Yet the Problem Remains”: Why Genetic Determinism Still Haunts Biomedical Research
ABSTRACT After the horrors of the Holocaust and its connections to eugenics were revealed to the world, many post‐war population geneticists sought to establish rhetorical distance from the Nazi's state‐led campaigns, without abandoning their belief that actively shaping the population's genetics would produce a prosperous society.
Christopher R. Donohue, Ian A. Myles
wiley +1 more source
Fads and Fallacies about Logic [PDF]
Throughout the history of AI, logic has been praised by its admirers, maligned by its detractors, and discussed in confusing and misleading terms by almost every body. This article reviews the controversies and suggests design options that can take advantage of the strengths of logic while avoiding the fads and ...
openaire +1 more source
Abstract Behavioural science research has the potential to develop evidence‐based strategies to fight disinformation about climate science and climate mitigation action; however, this research has yet to be conducted systematically with validated sets of climate disinformation stimuli. Here, we present the Climate Disinformation Corpus, a collection of
Tobia Spampatti +3 more
wiley +1 more source

