Results 221 to 230 of about 1,038 (254)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
2018
Plural phenomena are significant and inescapable. Granted, the plural idiom is sometimes reducible to the singular, e.g. ‘2 and 3 are prime is equivalent to ‘2 is prime and 3 is prime’. ‘Are prime’, however, belongs to the special class of predicates known as distributives.
Alex Oliver, Timothy Smiley
openaire +1 more source
Plural phenomena are significant and inescapable. Granted, the plural idiom is sometimes reducible to the singular, e.g. ‘2 and 3 are prime is equivalent to ‘2 is prime and 3 is prime’. ‘Are prime’, however, belongs to the special class of predicates known as distributives.
Alex Oliver, Timothy Smiley
openaire +1 more source
Logical Pluralism and Logical Consequence
2023Logical pluralism is the view that there is more than one correct logic. This is not necessarily a controversial claim but in its most exciting formulations, pluralism extends to logics that have typically been considered rival accounts of logical consequence – to logics, that is, which adopt seemingly contradictory views about basic logical laws or ...
openaire +1 more source
Substructural logics, pluralism and collapse
Synthese, 2018zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
Eduardo Alejandro Barrio +2 more
openaire +3 more sources
PLURAL QUANTIFICATION LOGIC: A CRITICAL APPRAISAL
The Review of Symbolic Logic, 2009I first show that most authors who developed Plural Quantification Logic (PQL) argued it could capture various features of natural language better than can other logic systems. I then show that it fails to do so: it radically departs from natural language in two of its essential features; namely, in distinguishing plural from singular quantification ...
openaire +3 more sources
What logical pluralism cannot be
Synthese, 2013zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
openaire +1 more source
The logic and meaning of plurals. I
Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2005zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
openaire +3 more sources
Logical Tools for Legal Pluralism
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2015This book is unique in presenting an interdisciplinary conversation between jurists and logicians. It brings together scholars from both law and philosophy and looks at the application of 'the new logics' to law and legal ordering, in a number of legal systems.
openaire +2 more sources
Radical Interpretation and Logical Pluralism
Topoi, 2017zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
openaire +1 more source
Problems for Logical Pluralism
History and Philosophy of Logic, 2013I argue that Beall and Restall's logical pluralism fails. Beall–Restall pluralism is the claim that there are different, equally correct logical consequence relations in a single language. Their position fails for two, related, reasons: first, it relies on an unmotivated conception of the ‘settled core’ of consequence: they believe that truth ...
openaire +1 more source