Results 221 to 230 of about 1,007,644 (283)
Mathematical modeling and analysis for the transmission dynamics of wheat yellow rust disease. [PDF]
Fantaye AK, Dawed MY, Mekonen KG.
europepmc +1 more source
ABSTRACT The leading‐order asymptotic behavior of the solution of the Cauchy initial‐value problem for the Benjamin–Ono equation in L2(R)$L^2(\mathbb {R})$ is obtained explicitly for generic rational initial data u0$u_0$. An explicit asymptotic wave profile uZD(t,x;ε)$u^\mathrm{ZD}(t,x;\epsilon)$ is given, in terms of the branches of the multivalued ...
Elliot Blackstone +3 more
wiley +1 more source
Linear reflected backward stochastic differential equations arising from vulnerable claims in markets with random horizon. [PDF]
Choulli T, Alsheyab S.
europepmc +1 more source
Generalized Euler method to study the vaccination effects on dynamics of measles infection model under non-singular kernel. [PDF]
Yadav LK +4 more
europepmc +1 more source
Fractional spatiotemporal Hahnfeldt tumor model with convergence analysis and optimal control. [PDF]
Can E.
europepmc +1 more source
Long-run logistics-based control of non-immunizing infectious diseases. [PDF]
Tsadikovich D.
europepmc +1 more source
Stringy Corrections to Heterotic SU(3)-Geometry. [PDF]
McOrist J, Picard S.
europepmc +1 more source
On the existence conditions of interaction indices in response surface models. [PDF]
Yumuk E, Ionescu C.
europepmc +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
The Review of Symbolic Logic, 2019
AbstractMathematical proof is the primary form of justification for mathematical knowledge, but in order to count as a proper justification for a piece of mathematical knowledge, a mathematical proof must be rigorous. What does it mean then for a mathematical proof to be rigorous?
openaire +3 more sources
AbstractMathematical proof is the primary form of justification for mathematical knowledge, but in order to count as a proper justification for a piece of mathematical knowledge, a mathematical proof must be rigorous. What does it mean then for a mathematical proof to be rigorous?
openaire +3 more sources

