The evolving trajectory of conjunction use in the ELT research articles. [PDF]
Front Res Metr AnalSafari M, Mahdavirad F.
europepmc +1 more source
The rise of promotional rhetoric in the Discussion Sections of an interdisciplinary field: a diachronic perspective. [PDF]
Front PsycholZhu Y, Li X.
europepmc +1 more source
Elucidating the emotional persona in the Romanian university students' academic discourse: a corpus-based exploration. [PDF]
Front PsycholDudău DP, Chitez M, Sava FA.
europepmc +1 more source
Constructing the national image of "China" in press conference interpreting: a corpus-based critical metaphor analysis. [PDF]
Front PsycholZhang C.
europepmc +1 more source
AI expectation violations and learner engagement in EFL contexts: a cognitive-affective recovery model. [PDF]
Front PsycholYu J, Dai X, Qiu B, Guo W, Wang R, Na M.
europepmc +1 more source
Social Representation of Mental Health Disorders in the Italian Big Brother VIP Edition. [PDF]
Behav Sci (Basel)Scardigno R, Gambarrota R, Centonze L.
europepmc +1 more source
Metadiscourse in a Disciplinary Context: An Overview
Chinese Journal of Applied LinguisticsCentral to successful communication is an integration of talk about the experiential world and how this is made coherent, intelligible and persuasive to a particular readership. Metadiscourse equips us to achieve this interactivity. Simply, metadiscourse
Jiang, Feng Kevin, Akbaş, Erdem
openaire +3 more sources
Related searches:
Metadiscourse in Academic Writing: A Reappraisal
Applied Linguistics, 2004Metadiscourse is self-reflective linguistic material referring to the evolving text and to the writer and imagined reader of that text. It is based on a view of writing as social engagement and in academic contexts reveals the ways that writers project themselves into their discourse to signal their attitude towards both the propositional content and ...
Tse, P, Hyland, K
openaire +3 more sources
Metadiscourse in Persuasive Writing
Written Communication, 1993Metadiscourse refers to writers' discourse about their discourse—their directions for how readers should read, react to, and evaluate what they have written about the subject matter. In this study the authors divided metadiscourse into textual metadiscourse (text markers and interpretive markers) and interpersonal metadiscourse (hedges, certainty ...
AVON CRISMORE +2 more
openaire +1 more source
Toward Automatic Classification of Metadiscourse
2014This paper describes the supervised classification of four metadiscursive functions in English. Training data is collected using crowdsourcing to label a corpus of TED talks transcripts with occurrences of Introductions, Conclusions, Examples, and Emphasis. Using decision trees and lexical features, we report classification accuracy.
Rui Correia +3 more
openaire +1 more source