Results 91 to 100 of about 9,967 (232)
The Logical Possibility of Moral Dilemmas in Expressivist Semantics: A Case Study
In this paper, using Mark Schroeder’s (2008a) expressivist semantic framework for normative language as a case study, I will identify difficulties that even an expressivist semantic theory capable of addressing the Frege-Geach problem will encounter in ...
Ryo Tanaka
doaj +1 more source
Is Statism an Amoral Philosophy?
Thick moral terms – such as theft, fraud, and counterfeiting – are terms whose very use implies a definitionally necessary moral evaluation of their content.
Wiśniewski Jakub Bożydar
doaj +1 more source
Towards an ethical framework about Big Data era: metaethical, normative ethical and hermeneutical approaches. [PDF]
Morán-Reyes AA.
europepmc +1 more source
Stoletý solitér Hans Albert v kontextu evropské filosofie (nejen) 20. století
On the occasion of the hundredth birthday of an important proponent of critical rationalism, Hans Albert, this article maps the key moments of his intellectual development and above all outlines his relationship to selected philosophical currents of (not
Paitlová, Jitka
doaj +1 more source
Non-Naturalism and Reference [PDF]
Metaethical realists disagree about the nature of normative properties. Naturalists think that they are ordinary natural properties: causally efficacious, a posteriori knowable, and usable in the best explanations of natural and social sciences.
Suikkanen, Jussi
core +1 more source
This paper critically examines coincidence arguments and evolutionary debunking arguments against non-naturalist realism in metaethics. It advances a version of these arguments that goes roughly like this: Given a non-naturalist, realist metaethic, it ...
Bedke, Matthew S.
core +1 more source
Can a Darwinian be a Christian? Sociobiological Issues
This essay looks at the Darwinian sociobiological account of morality, arguing that in major respects this philosophy should prove congenial to theChristian.
doaj +2 more sources
In recent work, several philosophers have begun to explicitly explore the conceptual ethics of normativity. Put roughly, this is a kind of normative and evaluative inquiry that aims to assess the normative words and concepts that we currently use, as well as salient possible alternative normative words and concepts that we might choose to adopt.
Tristram McPherson, David Plunkett
openaire +1 more source
What do you mean “This isn’t the question”? [PDF]
This is a contribution to the symposium on Tim Scanlon’s Being Realistic about Reasons. We have two aims here: First, we ask for more details about Scanlon’s meta-metaphysical view, showing problems with salient clarifications.
Enoch, David, McPherson, Tristram
core +1 more source

