Results 91 to 100 of about 3,015 (201)

Objective Moral Facts Exist in All Possible Universes

open access: yesReligions
The question of whether a God is needed to justify or ground moral facts is mooted by the fact that true moral facts exist in all possible universes that contain rational agents. This can be demonstrated in three stages. First, it is necessarily the case
Richard Carrier
doaj   +1 more source

C. S. Lewis and the Challenge of Ethics in Digital Society

open access: yesCommunications, 2018
This paper examines the idea that digital societies lack an ethical framework for understanding and mitigating the impact of digital technologies on human flourishing and the consequent diminishing of human agency.
Tibor Mahrik, Mark Neal
doaj   +1 more source

Implicit Metaethical Intuitions: Validating and Employing a New IAT Procedure. [PDF]

open access: yesRev Philos Psychol, 2023
Wagner JMJ, Pölzler T, Wright JC.
europepmc   +1 more source

Is Divine Law Indispensable to Moral Obligation? A Reply to Elizabeth Anscombe

open access: yesReligions
This paper assesses Elizabeth Anscombe’s influential argument in her 1958 essay “Modern Moral Philosophy,” which holds that secular moral obligation is metaphysically incoherent without a divine law framework.
Jeffery Jay Lowder
doaj   +1 more source

Ethical issues of the use of AI-driven mobile apps for education. [PDF]

open access: yesFront Public Health, 2022
Klimova B, Pikhart M, Kacetl J.
europepmc   +1 more source

Arguing About Metaethics

open access: yes, 2006
A work that comprises some of the most influential papers in metaethics.

core  

Metaethics and the Autonomy of Morality [PDF]

open access: yes, 2008
Some philosophers have been attracted to the idea that morality is an autonomous domain. One version of this idea is the thesis that non-moral claims are irrelevant to the justification of fundamental normative ethical theories.
Tristram McPherson
core  

Critique of Metaethical Constructivism

open access: yesPro-Fil
Metaethical constructivism, proposed by Sharon Street, has been described as a novel and promising metaethical theory. It is a form of cognitivist anti-realism that purports to be without substantive normative assumptions, while still allowing for the possibility of an agent being mistaken about what is normatively true for them.
openaire   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy