Results 161 to 170 of about 3,015 (201)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
ARCHIMEDEAN METAETHICS DEFENDED
Metaphilosophy, 2008Abstract:We sometimes say our moral claims are “objectively true,” or are “right, even if nobody believes it.” These additional claims are often taken to be staking out metaethical positions, representative of a certain kind of theorizing about morality that “steps outside” the practice in order to comment on its status.
openaire +3 more sources
Recherches anglaises et nord-américaines, 2003
Afin de soutenir une thèse nouvelle sur les relations entre l’éthique et la littérature, cet article expose une distinction essentielle entre deux domaines voisins mais séparés : les domaines de l'éthique et de la métaéthique. La notion de métaéthique référé à une sphère d’activité où s’apprend, s’expérimente ou s’analyse informe ou le processus du ...
openaire +2 more sources
Afin de soutenir une thèse nouvelle sur les relations entre l’éthique et la littérature, cet article expose une distinction essentielle entre deux domaines voisins mais séparés : les domaines de l'éthique et de la métaéthique. La notion de métaéthique référé à une sphère d’activité où s’apprend, s’expérimente ou s’analyse informe ou le processus du ...
openaire +2 more sources
2019
Abstract Aristotle’s critique of attempts to ground ethics in metaphysical abstractions would be the logical place for him to have articulated the case for a naturalistic ethics, but he does not do so. Rather, we find, in Eudemian Ethics, a contrary case for a distinction between the natural good and the practical good. Given Aristotle’s
openaire +1 more source
Abstract Aristotle’s critique of attempts to ground ethics in metaphysical abstractions would be the logical place for him to have articulated the case for a naturalistic ethics, but he does not do so. Rather, we find, in Eudemian Ethics, a contrary case for a distinction between the natural good and the practical good. Given Aristotle’s
openaire +1 more source
Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy
In this paper, I address what a Pyrrhonian moral skeptic would say about the ‘now what’ debate amongst another set of moral skeptics, moral error theorists. The ‘now what’ debate stems from the ways error theorists try to solve the ‘now what’ problem of deciding what to do with moral discourse once error theory is accepted.
openaire +1 more source
In this paper, I address what a Pyrrhonian moral skeptic would say about the ‘now what’ debate amongst another set of moral skeptics, moral error theorists. The ‘now what’ debate stems from the ways error theorists try to solve the ‘now what’ problem of deciding what to do with moral discourse once error theory is accepted.
openaire +1 more source
Rational learners and metaethics: Universalism, relativism, and evidence from consensus
Mind and Language, 2020Shaun Nichols
exaly