Results 41 to 50 of about 495 (131)
Do researchers claim their findings are applicable to the real world? An empirical study of social and personality psychology articlesDo researchers claim their findings are applicable to the real world? An empirical study of social and personality psychology articles [PDF]
Royal Society Open ScienceThe extent to which application claims are common in published articles can help provide insights into the norms and culture of a field. Estimating the prevalence of application claims, particularly in a literature that is not specifically an applied ...
Beth Clarke +3 more
doaj +1 more source
Digital Humanities in the Nordic and Baltic Countries Publications, 2020 This paper focuses on a long-term collaboration between the two poles of the DH-dipole; the D-pole: a CSCW (Computer-supported cooperative work) - Computer Science scholar, Sasha Rudan, and the H-pole: a Comparative Literature scholar, Eugenia Kelbert.
Sasha Mile Rudan +4 more
doaj +1 more source
COVID-19-related medical research: a meta-research and critical appraisal
BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2021 Background Since the start of the COVID-19 outbreak, a large number of COVID-19-related papers have been published. However, concerns about the risk of expedited science have been raised.
Marc Raynaud +18 more
doaj +1 more source
Mapping Canadian institutional research data management strategies: a cross-sectional study
FACETSIn March 2021, Canada’s three federal research funding agencies introduced the Tri-Agency Research Data Management (RDM) Policy, with the objective of promoting sound RDM and data stewardship practices at research institutions.
Chantal Ripp +17 more
doaj +1 more source
International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications, Volume 2026, Issue 1, 2026.Background Mobile and app‐based digital health interventions have rapidly emerged as transformative tools for breast cancer prevention, diagnosis, treatment adherence, and survivorship support. However, the expanding evidence base remains fragmented across multiple systematic reviews and meta‐analyses of varying quality.
Akbota Sabyr +6 more
wiley +1 more source
F1000ResearchBackground Scientists are increasingly concerned with making their work easy to verify and build upon. Associated practices include sharing data, materials, and analytic scripts, and preregistering protocols. This shift towards increased transparency and
Sarah Schiavone +7 more
doaj +1 more source
Dropout in Psychotherapy for Personality Disorders: A Systematic Review of Predictors
Clinical Psychology &Psychotherapy, Volume 32, Issue 3, May/June 2025.ABSTRACT Introduction Dropout in psychotherapy for personality disorders is a major challenge, affecting treatment efficacy and mental health care delivery. Influenced by patient characteristics, therapist factors and treatment dynamics, dropout remains prevalent. This systematic review identifies predictors of psychotherapy dropout in individuals with
Francesca De Salve +4 more
wiley +1 more source
The first six years of meta-research at PLOS Biology.
PLoS Biology, 2022 Meta-research involves the interrogation of every stage of the research lifecycle, from conception to publication and dissemination. Looking back over the first six years of PLOS Biology Meta-Research Articles highlights the important insights that can ...
Roland G Roberts +1 more
doaj +1 more source
Royal Society Open ScienceNonsignificant findings in psychological research are frequently misinterpreted as reflecting the effect’s absence. However, this issue’s exact prevalence remains unclear, as does whether this issue is getting better or worse.
Stephen Lee Murphy +3 more
doaj +1 more source
Recognizing the value of meta-research and making it easier to find
Journal of the Medical Library Association, 2023 Meta-research is a bourgeoning field studying topics with significant relevance to health sciences librarianship, such as research reproducibility, peer review, and open access.
Elizabeth Stevens, Gregory Laynor
doaj +1 more source