Results 181 to 190 of about 23,725 (259)

Patterns of MMPI-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) validity scale scores observed across Veteran Affairs settings.

Psychological services, 2020
The purpose of this investigation is to provide descriptive information on veteran response styles for a variety of VA referral types using the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI)-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF), which has well-supported ...
Paul B. Ingram, A. Tarescavage, Y. Ben-Porath, M. Oehlert   +3 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Psychometric properties of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-3 (MMPI-3) in a clinical neuropsychology setting.

Psychological Assessment, 2020
The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) instruments have a longstanding history of clinical applications in neuropsychological settings, and many studies have supported the utility of MMPI-2-Restructured Form scores among specific ...
Megan R. Whitman, Jessica L. Tylicki, Ramia Mascioli, Jody L Pickle, Y. Ben-Porath   +4 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Normalizing the MMPI

Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1976
Effective psychological services require recognition of a client's strengths as well as weaknesses. Personality tests such as the MMPI, however, focus attention upon the abnormal and deviant attributes of personality. Therefore, a psychologist should have an understanding of various adaptive behaviors that may be indicated by moderately elevated MMPI ...
J T, Kunce, W P, Anderson
openaire   +2 more sources

Keane PTSD scale: MMPI and MMPI‐2 update

Journal of Traumatic Stress, 1992
AbstractThis paper addresses questions regarding the use and interpretation of the Keane MMPI PTSD scale. Particular focus is placed on issues to consider when using various versions of the MMPI including Form R, the group form, and the new MMPI‐2.
Judith A. Lyons, Terence M. Keane
openaire   +1 more source

Assessing Depression With the MMPI and MMPI-2

Journal of Personality Assessment, 2000
The usefulness of the MMPI (Hathaway & McKinley, 1951 ) and MMPI-2 (Butcher, Dahlstrom, Graham, Tellegen, & Kaemmer, 1989) for diagnosing and assessing symptomatic depression has been the subject of considerable debate for a number of years. In this article, we review the relative contributions of the MMPI and MMPI-2 clinical and content scales in ...
K, Gross, M D, Keyes, R L, Greene
openaire   +2 more sources

Methodological problems and issues in MMPI, MMPI-2, and MMPI-A research.

Psychological Assessment, 1995
Personality questionnaires are among the most versatile and user-friendly approaches to personality assessment. This article focuses on methodological considerations in conducting research on the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2 ; J. N. Butcher, W. G. Dahlstrom, J. R. Graham, A. Tellegen, & B.
James N. Butcher, John R. Graham, Yossef S. Ben-Porath   +2 more
openaire   +1 more source

Cross-validation of MMPI and MMPI-2 predictor scales

Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1996
Nineteen Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) or revised Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI-2) scales, purported to be predictive of treatment outcome, were related to length of stay (LOS) in a domiciliary and to discharge status from a domiciliary for 335 subjects.
A L, Aaronson, O B, Dent, C D, Kline
openaire   +2 more sources

Sex Differences on the MMPI-1 and MMPI-2

Psychological Reports, 1997
This study compared sex differences on the MMPI-2 to those previously found on the MMPI-1. Statistically significant differences were found with men (n = 66) showing higher mean raw scale scores on antisocial (men = 10.00, women = 7.15), authority problems (men = 4.58, women = 3.14), admission of addiction (men = 3.58, women = 2.74), amorality (men ...
J, Gumbiner, J, Flowers
openaire   +2 more sources

Validity of the MMPI personality disorder scales (MMPI-PD)

Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1994
The MMPI Personality Disorder scales, developed by Morey, Waugh, and Blashfield (1985), were validated on an inpatient population by comparing 104 patients' MMPI-PD scores with the MCMI and with DSM-III-R diagnosis. Conservative significance levels were used to ensure more valid conclusions.
C E, Schuler, J R, Snibbe, J G, Buckwalter   +2 more
openaire   +2 more sources

MMPI

2012
?? ???????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????? ?????????????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????????? 78 ??????????????????-???????????????????? 17-25 ?????????????? ????????????????. ???????????? ???????????????????????? ???? ?????????????????????? ?????????? ??????I ???? 13 ???????????????? ?? 118 ????????????
openaire   +3 more sources