Results 181 to 190 of about 413 (210)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Mock Trial Jury Decisions as a Function of Adolescent Juror Guilt and Hostility
The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1984A fictitious court case involving child abuse was presented to 277 male adolescent jurors (138 college freshmen, means age = 19.25 years, 139 junior high school males, means age = 13.47 years) in an effort to determine if the tendency to deal harshly with alleged criminals is dependent upon certain personality characteristics of adolescent jurors.
A M, Ackerman, P M, McMahon, L A, Fehr
openaire +2 more sources
The influence of prior relationship on perceptions of stalking in mock jury deliberations
Forensic Update, 2011Ex-partner stalkers are more persistent and more likely to use violence than stranger or acquaintance stalkers, but are less likely to incur criminal convictions. The current research explores the influence of prior relationship on mock jury deliberations and verdict decisions in relation to a hypothetical case tried under the Protection from ...
Adrian J. Scott, Jeff Gavin
openaire +1 more source
Justice needs a new blindfold: A review of mock jury research.
Psychological Bulletin, 1977Studies on factors that may influence jurors' verdicts are reviewed. These factors include characteristics of the jurors, characteristics of the victim and defendant, judges' instructions regarding pretrial publicity and inadmissible evidence, number and severity of decision alternatives, jurors' conception of guilt, and size of the jury and its ...
Kathleen C. Gerbasi +2 more
openaire +1 more source
Prediction of first ballot mock jury votes by the Analytic Juror Rater
Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 2003Two scales of Abbott's (1987) Analytic Juror Rater (AJR) were used with 24 mock jurors to predict first ballot mock jury votes. Each participant observed one of two mock trial proceedings involving an actual second degree murder case. In a moot courtroom, they heard arguments from attorneys and witnessed examination of the defendant and actors ...
C. Gary Pettigrew, Lewis Unglesby
openaire +1 more source
Mock juror sampling issues in jury simulation research: A meta-analysis.
Law and Human Behavior, 2017The advantages and disadvantages of jury simulation research have often been debated in the literature. Critics chiefly argue that jury simulations lack verisimilitude, particularly through their use of student mock jurors, and that this limits the generalizabilty of the findings.
Brian H, Bornstein +6 more
openaire +2 more sources
How the need for cognition scale predicts behavior in mock jury deliberations.
Law and Human Behavior, 2004The role of Need for Cognition (NC) in mock jury deliberations was examined. Study 1 showed that when groups of 4 (2 high and 2 low in NC) deliberated together, high-NCs spoke significantly longer than low-NCs and were perceived as more active and more persuasive.
Donna, Shestowsky, Leonard M, Horowitz
openaire +2 more sources
Methodological Problems in Mock Jury Research
The Journal of Social Psychology, 1984Pamela M. McMahon, Lawrence A. Fehr
openaire +1 more source
Authoritarianism and decisions of mock juries: Evidence of jury bias and group polarization.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1978Robert M. Bray, Audrey M. Noble
openaire +1 more source
Race and Accent Bias: A Mock Jury Investigation in a Blue State
Asian Americans are historically underrepresented in social psychology research. Little research has been done regarding anti-Asian sentiment or the barriers Asian people face in the judicial system. Using a mock-jury-style laboratory experiment, the current study aims to fills this gap in previous research regarding accent bias.openaire +1 more source