Transformative Experiences, Cognitive Modelling and Affective Forecasting. [PDF]
Mathony M, Messerli M.
europepmc +1 more source
Conflict detection with invalid inferences: All heuristics, no logic. [PDF]
Kosourikhina V, Handley SJ.
europepmc +1 more source
The mesolimbic system and the loss of higher order network features in schizophrenia when learning without reward. [PDF]
Martin E +12 more
europepmc +1 more source
The quantitative paradigm and the nature of the human mind. The replication crisis as an epistemological crisis of quantitative psychology in view of the ontic nature of the psyche. [PDF]
Mayrhofer R, Büchner IC, Hevesi J.
europepmc +1 more source
Research Hypothesis: A Brief History, Central Role in Scientific Inquiry, and Characteristics. [PDF]
Ghasemi A +3 more
europepmc +1 more source
On some analogies between the counterexamples to modus ponens (and modus tollens)
openaire +1 more source
Related searches:
Epistemic modals and modus tollens
Philosophical Studies, 2016Epistemic modals in consequent place of indicative conditionals give rise to apparent counterexamples to Modus Tollens. Familiar assumptions behind familiar truth conditional theories of embedded modality facilitate a prima facie explanation—viz., that the target cases harbor epistemic modal equivocations. However, this sort of explanation goes too far.
openaire +1 more source
Modus Tollens, Modus Shmollens: Contrapositive reasoning and the pragmatics of negation
Thinking & Reasoning, 2007The utterance of a negative statement invites the pragmatic inference that some reason exists for the proposition it negates to be true; this pragmatic inference paves the way for the logically unexpected Modus Shmollens inference: “If p then q; not-q; therefore, p.” Experiment 1 shows that a majority of reasoners endorse Modus Shmollens from an ...
Jean-François Bonnefon +1 more
openaire +1 more source
Analysis for correct reasoning by robots: modus ponens, modus tollens
Eighth Annual International Phoenix Conference on Computers and Communications. 1989 Conference Proceedings, 2003Reasoning by a robot relates to commands it receives in the natural language in the form of incompletely stated arguments, i.e. enthymemes. An attempt is made by the robot to seek out missing premises or conclusions that will produce valid arguments on the basis of two inference rules, modus ponens and modus tollens.
openaire +1 more source

