Results 11 to 20 of about 4,245 (213)

Numerical Range of Moore–Penrose Inverse Matrices [PDF]

open access: yesMathematics, 2020
Let A be an n-by-n matrix. The numerical range of A is defined as W ( A ) = { x * A x : x ∈ C n , x * x = 1 } . The Moore–Penrose inverse A + of A is the unique matrix satisfying A A + A = A , A + A A + = A ...
Mao-Ting Chien
doaj   +2 more sources

Convexity of the inverse and Moore–Penrose inverse [PDF]

open access: yesLinear Algebra and its Applications, 2011
Based on a re-examination of the convexity results for the inverse of positive definite matrices, and the Moore-Penrose inverse of nonnegative definite matrices, a more general concept of strong convexity is defined which provides additional information on the convexity behaviour and geometry of matrix functions known to be strictly convex.
Nordström, Kenneth, Kenneth Nordström
openaire   +3 more sources

The generalized Moore-Penrose inverse [PDF]

open access: yesLinear Algebra and its Applications, 1992
The generalized Moore-Penrose inverse of a matrix over an integral domain with involution is defined. Necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of this inverse are given. Uniqueness is proven and a formula given which leads toward a ``generalized Cramer's rule'' to find the generalized Moore-Penrose solution.
Manjunatha Prasad, K., Bapat, R.B.
openaire   +2 more sources

Moore–Penrose inverse in rings with involution [PDF]

open access: yesLinear Algebra and its Applications, 2007
Let \(R\) be a ring with involution. An element \(a\in R\) is called regular if there exists an element \(b\in R\) such that \(a=aba\). A regular element \(a \in R\) is called Moore-Penrose invertible if there is an element \(a^\dag \in R\) such that \(aa^\dag a=a\), \(a^\dag aa^\dag=a^\dag\), \((aa^\dag)^*=aa^\dag\) and \((a^\dag a)^*=a^\dag a\).
Koliha, J.J.   +2 more
openaire   +2 more sources

The Moore-Penrose inverse of a retrocirculant [PDF]

open access: yesLinear Algebra and its Applications, 1978
AbstractIn a recent paper Chao [2] has determined the eigenvalues of a matrix of the form A=PC where P is a permutation matrix which commutes with a certain unitary matrix and C is a circulant. Here we determine the Moore-Penrose inverse of such a “retrocirculant” and show that the nonzero eigenvalues of the Moore-Penrose inverse are the reciprocals of
Smith, Ronald L.
openaire   +2 more sources

A characterization of the Moore-Penrose inverse [PDF]

open access: yesLinear Algebra and its Applications, 1993
The inverse \(X\) of a square matrix \(A\) may be characterized as the unique matrix for which the two by two block matrix with entries \(\{A,I,I,X\}\) has the same rank as \(A\). This paper gives a generalization for singular and rectangular \(A\) using the Moore-Penrose inverse \(A^ +\).
Fiedler, Miroslav, Markham, Thomas L.
openaire   +3 more sources

A note on the convexity of the Moore–Penrose inverse [PDF]

open access: yesLinear Algebra and its Applications, 2018
zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
Kenneth, Nordström, Nordström, Kenneth
openaire   +3 more sources

Dykstra's Algorithm and a Representation of the Moore–Penrose Inverse [PDF]

open access: yesJournal of Approximation Theory, 2002
The convergence of Lardy's series representation of the Moore-Penrose inverse of a closed unbounded linear operator is proved via Dykstra's alternating projection algorithm.
Groetsch, C.W.
openaire   +2 more sources

On the covariance of the Moore-Penrose inverse [PDF]

open access: yesLinear Algebra and its Applications, 1984
Let A be an \(n\times n\) matrix and T an invertible matrix of the same order. If A is invertible, then, of course, \((TAT^{-1})^{-1}=TA^{- 1}T^{-1}\) and A is covariant under the general linear group. If A is arbitrary and the inverse is replaced by the Moore-Penrose inverse then A is no longer covariant under the full linear group. Given A the author
Robinson, Donald W.
openaire   +3 more sources

Expressions and characterizations for the Moore-Penrose inverse [PDF]

open access: yes, 2023
Under certain conditions, we prove that the Moore-Penrose inverse of a sum of operators is the sum of the Moore-Penrose inverses. From this, we derive expressions and characterizations for the Moore-Penrose inverse of an operator that are useful for its ...
Patricia Morillas   +2 more
core   +2 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy