Results 11 to 20 of about 6,519,560 (277)
A Christological Critique of Divine Command Theory
Religions, 2023 This paper presents a theological critique of divine command theory, a metaethical theory stating that moral wrongness is constituted by God’s command.
Martin Jakobsen
doaj +1 more source
Religions, 2023 Erik Wielenberg has offered a fascinating argument from moral psychology against a sophisticated theistic account of moral obligations: Divine Command Theory (DCT).
Christopher R. Pruett
doaj +1 more source
Ethics of Strategic Voting in Popular Elections [PDF]
Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej, 2022 Misreporting of preferences is a common behavior among voters but still considered as moral wrongdoing. I propose the conceptual framework of its dilemmas and argue that tactical voting may NOT be regarded as a moral wrong if implemented in a popular ...
Łukasz Łyżwa
doaj +1 more source
"Inculpable Ignorance" in war: Collateral damage and supreme emergency [PDF]
Megatrend Revija, 2022 In this paper, author aims to determine the existence of the possibility of the inculpable ignorance argument even for acts of combatants in war, in specific contexts of collateral damage and supreme emergency.
Stanar Dragan
doaj +1 more source
The Existence of God and the Efficacy of Morality [PDF]
پژوهشنامه فلسفه دین, 2015 In this paper, after a brief description of some common moral arguments for the existence of God, there is suggested a new argument entitled "necessity of the existence of a compensatory world or God for efficacy of morality". It is believed that in some
Masoud Sadeghi, Asadollah Azhir
doaj +1 more source
To what theories of laws of nature B. Faul’s argument is applicable? [PDF]
Омский научный вестник: Серия "Общество. История. Современность", 2020 The derivative argument of the consequences is aimed at proving the incompatibility of certain theories of the laws of nature in conjunction with physicalism and the existence of moral responsibility.
T. S. Demin
doaj +1 more source
The argument from moral psychology [PDF]
Belgrade Philosophical Annual, 2015 The argument from moral psychology is one of the strongest arguments that non-cognitivists use against cognitivism-the metaethical position according to which our moral judgements express beliefs.
Milevski Voin
doaj +1 more source
The Impact of the Moral Foundations Arguments on Early Adolescents
Ethics in Progress, 2021 The empirical research reported in this article is based on the Moral Foundations Theory proposed by J. Haidt. Objectives. The author examines the impact of moral foundations arguments on early adolescents’ moral judgments regarding violating moral rules
Kamila Stastna
doaj +1 more source
Examining the âMotivationa Introversionâ Argument about Meaning [PDF]
Metaphysics, 2016 Kripke uses a fictional skeptical character in order to review and refuses “cognitive meaning” theory. According to this theory, the propositions which contain reference to the meaning (like the proposition, “using the word ‘table’, Maryam means the ...
seyedAli Kalantari
doaj +1 more source
Overconsumption, Procreation, and Morality
Ethics in Progress, 2014 Thomas Young (2001) argues that overconsumption and procreation are morally equivalent, and thus that anyone who disapproves of overconsumption must arrive at the same normative judgment concerning procreation (or procreation beyond a certain threshold).
John Mariana
doaj +3 more sources