Results 21 to 30 of about 789,875 (293)
Is calibration a fairness requirement?
2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency, 2022 In this paper, we provide a moral analysis of two criteria of statistical fairness debated in the machine learning literature: 1) calibration between groups and 2) equality of false positive and false negative rates between groups. In our paper, we focus on moral arguments in support of either measure. The conflict between group calibration vs.
Loi, Michele, Heitz, Christoph
openaire +2 more sources
The Paradox of Anti-Democratic Arguments: a defence of democratic principles in debate
Science & Philosophy, 2023 Conventional approaches in pro- or anti-democratic discourses often scrutinize the efficacy of leadership based on its outcomes, or explore the moral foundations of different systems.
Bekesi B Aron
doaj +1 more source
, 2020 The moral error theory generally does not receive good press in metaethics. This paper adds to the bad news. In contrast to other critics, though, I do not attack error theorists’ characteristic thesis that no moral assertion is ever true.
Tiefensee, Christine
core
Robot rights? Towards a social-relational justification of moral consideration \ud [PDF]
, 2010 Should we grant rights to artificially intelligent robots? Most current and near-future robots do not meet the hard criteria set by deontological and utilitarian theory. Virtue ethics can avoid this problem with its indirect approach.
A MacIntyre +37 more
core +4 more sources
Law’s Argumentative Structure Belies the New “Moral Impact” Theory of Law [PDF]
Proceedings of the 10th International RAIS Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities (RAIS 2018), 2018 The new Moral Impact Theory (“MIT”) of law is novel, innovative, and influential. It claims that the moral impacts of legal institutional actions, rather than the linguistic content of any “rules” or pronouncements, determine law’s content. MIT’s corollary is thereby that the practice of legal interpretation consists in the inquiry into what is morally
openaire +1 more source
Possible Dilemmas Raised by Impossible Moral Requirements
Feminist Philosophy Quarterly, 2016 The priority that Tessman’s argument gives to phenomenological and neuropsychological explanations of moral requirements entails a fundamental shift in our understanding of these.
Lisa Rivera
doaj +1 more source
Are We Playing a Moral Lottery? Moral Disagreement from a Metasemantic Perspective
Ergo, An Open Access Journal of Philosophy, 2021 If someone disagrees with my moral views, or more generally if I’m in a group of n people who all disagree with each other, but I don’t have any special evidence or basis for my epistemic superiority, then it’s at best a 1-in-n chance that my views are ...
Sinan Dogramaci
doaj +2 more sources
Wacana: Journal of the Humanities of Indonesia, 2003 This paper sugests the readers to be critical in their concern for the problem of pornography. It seems clear that pornography is a moral problem, but a simple argument from Traditional Philosophy of Language has shown that pornography does not have any ...
Herminie Soemitro
doaj +1 more source
Filosofia Unisinos, 2020 We are pleased to present to the Brazilian and international philosophical community the third number of the twenty-one volume (2020 - September-December) of Unisinos Journal of Philosophy, which consists of eight articles and one book review.
Denis Coitinho
doaj +1 more source
Morals From Rationality Alone? Some Doubts [PDF]
, 2020 Contractarians aim to derive moral principles from the dictates of instrumental rationality alone. But it is well-known that contractarian moral theories struggle to identify normative principles that are both uniquely rational and morally compelling ...
Messina, J. P., Wiens, David
core