Results 21 to 30 of about 19,557 (284)
Against directive teaching in the moral Community of Inquiry: A response to Michael Hand
While we consider directive teaching to be detrimental to the Community of Inquiry (CoI), we nonetheless find ourselves in qualified agreement with Hand as he challenges certain norms of practice that support the common presumption in favour of ...
Michelle Sowey, Grace Lockrobin
doaj +1 more source
The Personite Problem and the Stage-Theoretic Reply [PDF]
Personites are shorter-lived, person-like things that extend across part of a person’s life. Their existence follows from the standard perdurance view of persons. Johnston argues that it has bizarre moral consequences.
Harold Noonan
doaj +1 more source
Robot Morality: Bertram F. Malle’s Concept of Moral Competence
Bertram F. Malle is one of the first scientists, combining robotics with moral competence. His theory outlines that moral competence can be understood as a system of five components including moral norms, a moral vocabulary, moral cognition, moral ...
André Schmiljun
doaj +1 more source
The Paradox of Anti-Democratic Arguments: a defence of democratic principles in debate
Conventional approaches in pro- or anti-democratic discourses often scrutinize the efficacy of leadership based on its outcomes, or explore the moral foundations of different systems.
Bekesi B Aron
doaj +1 more source
Possible Dilemmas Raised by Impossible Moral Requirements
The priority that Tessman’s argument gives to phenomenological and neuropsychological explanations of moral requirements entails a fundamental shift in our understanding of these.
Lisa Rivera
doaj +1 more source
Are We Playing a Moral Lottery? Moral Disagreement from a Metasemantic Perspective
If someone disagrees with my moral views, or more generally if I’m in a group of n people who all disagree with each other, but I don’t have any special evidence or basis for my epistemic superiority, then it’s at best a 1-in-n chance that my views are ...
Sinan Dogramaci
doaj +2 more sources
Pain for the Moral Error Theory? A New Companions-in-Guilt Argument [PDF]
ABSTRACTThe moral error theorist claims that moral discourse is irredeemably in error because it is committed to the existence of properties that do not exist. A common response has been to postulate ‘companions in guilt’—forms of discourse that seem safe from error despite sharing the putatively problematic features of moral discourse.
openaire +1 more source
Facts about moral disagreement and human evolution have both been said to exclude the possibility of moral knowledge, but the question of how these challenges interact has largely gone unaddressed.
Tersman, Folke, +3 more
core +1 more source
This paper sugests the readers to be critical in their concern for the problem of pornography. It seems clear that pornography is a moral problem, but a simple argument from Traditional Philosophy of Language has shown that pornography does not have any ...
Herminie Soemitro
doaj +1 more source
We are pleased to present to the Brazilian and international philosophical community the third number of the twenty-one volume (2020 - September-December) of Unisinos Journal of Philosophy, which consists of eight articles and one book review.
Denis Coitinho
doaj +1 more source

